No it’s because the great majority of blame comes from leftist jerks who want to (and have) immasculate the American Male.
Now live with the consequences.
“No it’s because the great majority of blame comes from leftist jerks who want to (and have) immasculate the American Male.
Now live with the consequences.”
I see you don’t like to face facts.
Your choice.
Now live with the consequences.
That's a disturbing statement. There's a common attitude of "Well, better safe than sorry!" when it comes to children and child abuse...at least where men are involved. Virtually no abuse is enough for the state to interfere with a mother.
The double standard is palpable. Those who advocate the "better safe than sorry" approach seem to be blind to the consequences of that approach. It's fundamentally changed the relationship between men and children, even their own children.
There's no great leap of logic between "Men can't be trusted around children," to "Men can't be trusted around their own children."
Your post is just #48, that's as far as I've gotten; undoubtedly before I get to the end I'll see some of this:
---Poster will successfully point out that current situation is alienating men from their children, at a time when most people think the opposite should happen.
---Poster will reply that we need to have men involved in their children's lives.
---Poster will reply that the danger to men is imaginary, as it makes no sense to her, as a woman.
---Some "real man" poster will reply that any man not willing to go to jail to have a relationship with his own children is no man at all.
---Another poster will chime in that this thread, instead of illustrating the danger to children, has become another woman-hating-men thread.