Out of curiosity, why do you call a woman that purposely endangers a child stupid?
Would you call a man that willfully exposes a child to a sociopath for his personal gain "stupid" or would you call him a miscreant?
This is precisely the double standard that men like me shake our heads at. There is a willingness to find a woman to be a victim, even when she is the perpetrator.
How many husbands have you ever heard get off of a murder charge because they were overwrought? Shall we start counting the number of women that have gotten off or very light sentences for killing their husband and/or children?
When a woman drowns her five children, her mental status immediately becomes the focus. Not so with men.
“Out of curiosity, why do you call a woman that purposely endangers a child stupid”
That comment was made during a discussion about women who shack up with abusive men - then mommy’s new boyfriend damages the children. dumb dumb dumb.
And if a man brought home a girlfriend who was hurting the children, I would say the same thing...dumb dumb dumb.
“How many husbands have you ever heard get off of a murder charge because they were overwrought? Shall we start counting the number of women that have gotten off or very light sentences for killing their husband and/or children?”
I didn’t realize that was the topic.
The op referred to the fact that parents want their children to be more careful about contact with men.
I think that is because parents are most afraid of kidnap, rape, and murder.
Most of these types of crimes are committed by men.
I have NOT stated that most men are predators.
I WILL state that most men are good guys.