Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillyBoy

I agree about Reagan; however, I wouldn’t include Bush because he’s NO conservative. He spent like a drunk sailor (my apologies to sailers because at least they spend their own money) for five years and gave us the biggest entitlement (prescription drugs) since LBJ. He’s sided with the leftists on affirmative action, failed to secure our borders, and has been totally devoid of any principles of conservatism. Another four years of him and we’ll really be ruined! Even in Texas, as governor, he supported the liberal agenda more than he did conservative core principles. But his main impetus (like his father’s) is to “get along.”


239 posted on 09/08/2007 9:25:49 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: T.L.Sink
The premise of my posts is that Governors mostly win Presidential elections, not that Governors always turn out to be great Presidents. Obviously if Bill Richardson gets elected President, he's not going to be a good one.

There are very few Presidents who turn out to be solid conservatives. The two who have governed as solid conservatives during the last 100 years are Reagan and Coolidge, both former Governors.

Though I think if you look at the backgrounds of the "greatest" Presidents, you'll find they come from all kinds of backgrounds and walks of life.

246 posted on 09/09/2007 10:49:17 AM PDT by BillyBoy (FACT: Governors win. Senators DON'T. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson