[The KG9 Kid]

"... You argue that removing this guy is doing the work of the anti gunners, but you would have what appears to be an anti gunner on the board of the group that is supposed to defend our rights.

No, I argue that removing this guy outside the NRA established process of voting would be doing the work of the anti-gunners.

There is a significant difference.

[Harvey105]

If there is a process for removing/replacing a member then it is not outside the normal process. I am sure there is a process and there certainly seems to be just cause. As long as he stays, he is a problem for gun owners and the perception of the NRA as an organization that really wants to protect the entire unfettered right that they claim to stand for.

There is nothing over the top about wanting your rights, is there?

[donozark]

Article lX of the NRA Bylaws specifies removal procedure. Too long for me too type (3 pages).

Briefly: Any Officer/Director may be removed by petition of any voting member of Association. Petition must be submitted 150 days prior to annual mtg. 450 signatures required. At the time of regular election of Directors voting members will be informed of the recall petition and allowed to vote on said petition.

There is a procedure. Organization. That is what separates us (NRA) from a Democrat Convention...