Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Message from Ron Paul
Ron Paul 2008 ^ | September 07, 2007 | Ron Paul

Posted on 09/07/2007 10:40:07 AM PDT by NapkinUser

Edited on 09/07/2007 2:31:57 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560561-565 next last
To: mnehrling; All

No Ron Paul would be reading the Constitution to make sure that Nuclear m\Missiles is covered in the Constitution..


521 posted on 09/09/2007 4:29:58 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Mitt Romney 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
No Ron Paul would be reading the Constitution to make sure that Nuclear m\Missiles is covered in the Constitution..

While others would never ever consider even using nuclear weapons regardless of the event.

522 posted on 09/09/2007 5:02:56 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

The very first, as it happens.


523 posted on 09/09/2007 5:18:29 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
Nice unbalanced diatribe.

According to our Constitution, the Executive has authority over the US armed forces and therefore may deploy them wherever in the world he sees fit if he believes it serves to keep America safe.

Moreover the Constitution invests the Executive with authority to negotiate treaties and agreements with foreign nations and to to define the terms of such agreements. He is fully within his rights to garrison their countries with US forces if the US Executive sees fit.

Go back to school before you flip out again.

524 posted on 09/09/2007 5:24:12 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
According to our Constitution, the Executive has authority over the US armed forces and therefore may deploy them wherever in the world he sees fit if he believes it serves to keep America safe.

That may be true, but considering the current crowd holding on to the reins of leadership in D.C., using nuclear weapons would never, ever be considered. And their excuse would be, that even if terrorist nuked Dallas, they would tell us it was not state sponsored. When we all know that would not be true, as the terrorist states are well defined, as they were even prior to 911.

525 posted on 09/09/2007 5:51:35 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
Any attempts on votes on anything that the precinct chair does not want is quickly ruled out of order.

And, yes, I am in the process of stacking the next meeting.
526 posted on 09/09/2007 9:50:01 PM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
Your response diminishes anything that you have to say about these issues, including the value of your own son's service.

Shame on you, you shameful, shameful person.
527 posted on 09/09/2007 9:54:29 PM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Yes, I do think he borrowed it.


528 posted on 09/10/2007 5:54:43 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

‘Now I have a mental image of one of the Plushy scenes from CSI stuck in my head! Oh well, I deserve it for watching.’

Now for some fun....whick Plushy is Ron Paul?


529 posted on 09/10/2007 5:59:38 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima; All

Not sure what point you’re trying to get at here, but if you are being serious about your posts to me and not just attempting sarcasm, then please, tell me, why in the hell should I give a rats ass what you think? I think my family’s 354 year history in this country; history of fighting in every major war since the Revolutionary War give me at least as much right as anyone else to render my opinion regarding this and any other issue involving this nation. My comments regarding Ru Paul has exactly zero effect on the value of my son’s service and you can kiss my - no I will not stoop to your level.


530 posted on 09/10/2007 7:26:43 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: Badeye; SoldierDad
Badeye-A never dying thread.

SoldierDad-It's my understanding he was drafted, later enlisted in the Air National Guard. An interesting quote below, he seems to have some concerns about the nature of his service.

Congressman Paul: I was an Air Force Flight surgeon on active duty from about 1963. One personal experience I had that really made me start to think about the war was that I was doing many physicals on Army warrant officers who were seeking to become helicopter pilots. I don't know if you remember, but in the early years of the Vietnam war many of our helicopters were shot down. That made me think seriously about my role in the Vietnam fiasco. In one way I was not directly participating, but indirectly I was. As the years have gone by, I have become much more fascinated with foreign policy as a result of that experience and it has played a role in leading me to totally reject our insane foreign policy which causes us to get involved in places like Vietnam.

531 posted on 09/10/2007 7:43:23 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Nothing in my post claimed that Ru Paul said he joined for non-patriotic ambition. In fact, I never claimed that he joined for non-patriotic ambition. Those words were posted by someone else, not me. I said that he used his military service to further his own career aspirations. If any one took the time to read his bio they would have seen that it claims he was drafted during the Cuban Missile Crisis (of which I am aware of no instances of anyone being drafted at that time - since it was before th Vietnam draft was instituted). His bio cleary states that he never served outside of U.S. airspace during the Vietnam war - I raise the question about how he managed to pull that off if he was drafted prior to the Vietnam war. If anyone has any information that refutes a possibility he used influence to avoid participating in Vietnam, please post it.
532 posted on 09/10/2007 7:44:25 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Yes, the bio that I read does make the claim that he was drafted. But, during the Cuban Missile Crisis? Was anyone being drafted in that time period? I have never heard of anyone being drafted during that period and would like for someone to give information on that.

As to his words, I'm not surprised that he would make such comments after the fact.

533 posted on 09/10/2007 7:48:12 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

His personal knowledge of ‘insanity’ comes through....


534 posted on 09/10/2007 7:49:14 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
1963--119,265
535 posted on 09/10/2007 7:52:46 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Okay, then there were draftees during that period of time. Thanks for the information.


536 posted on 09/10/2007 7:55:12 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"as an absolute, no-good Goddamn liar."

How Catholic!!

537 posted on 09/10/2007 7:57:01 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I call them as I see them.


538 posted on 09/10/2007 7:57:55 AM PDT by Petronski (Cleveland Indians: Pennant -14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

As do I.


539 posted on 09/10/2007 8:02:23 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
Go and read the bio on Ru Paul. Serve? Sure, he was in the military - briefly. But did he serve his country? No, he used his brief military experience to further his career aspirations and never was in any way involved in anything remotely like real service to this country.

452 posted on 09/08/2007 11:44:35 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)

I read does make the claim that he was drafted. But, during the Cuban Missile Crisis? Was anyone being drafted in that time period? I have never heard of anyone being drafted during that period and would like for someone to give information on that.

533 posted on 09/10/2007 7:48:12 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Division Soldier fighting terrorists in the Triangle of Death)

You'd think such an expert on patriotism would know this.

And for me personally, reading your statements, mocking those that served, to further your political agenda what ever that may be is getting a little old.

I've seen you post multiple times about how your family has been in this country 354 years, has served in every war etc. You seem to wear all that on your sleeve, broadcasting it regularly.

My family has been here 369 years, fought in all wars, one of which had historic notable mention for his involvement in the revolutionary war, two of which left their body parts fighting in foreign lands, and two others have provided protection for 3 different Presidents of the United States. I rarely mention it, and to be sure, it certainly does not make me any better than any other American, and I will certainly not use my family background to mock or question others that served this country honorably.

540 posted on 09/10/2007 10:44:13 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560561-565 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson