To: rface
However, with a 33% win in the post-debate poll, it is Ron Paul who should be laughing. Of course, Sean Hannity could not resist making the ridiculous statement that the Paulites had spammed the poll. The argument, both false and illogical, is used to attempt to plant the seed in the minds of the American people that Ron cant win, and conclude he is a wasted vote.
If it were possible to vote multiple times from one cell phone, then what would be the advantage for Ron Paul anyway? The mainstream media would have us believe that the front-runner candidates are so popular, wouldnt their supporters also text multiple times? In any case, it is impossible to vote twice. I tried it to make sure. So, unless Ron Paul supporters have suddenly become an independently wealthy group of lunatics, with dozens of cell phones each, the results must be representative of REAL PEOPLE. No, it means that the Paulies cared enough about a stupid little poll to vote. This is why online polls mean jackshit. They aren't representative samples of the population. Paul can't even crack 23% in real polls.
71 posted on
09/07/2007 9:14:48 AM PDT by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Now more popular than Congress!* *According to a new RasMESSen Poll.)
To: WinOne4TheGipper
Paul can't even crack 23% in real polls.
Paul has never cracked 2.3% in the polls.
When he was relatively sane in the 1988 election he got .48% of the vote.
73 posted on
09/07/2007 9:16:17 AM PDT by
elizabetty
(Ron Paul - Because Moonbats Need Choices Too!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson