Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: malamute

His policy is to get our troops out of Iraq. Even according to Bush, we celebrated “mission accomplished” a couple years ago, actually only several months after the war started. Why are we still there, getting our troops killed to no purpose or court martialling them for doing the job they’re trained to do? I spent my adult life in the Marine Corps, even going to one war that we were not allowed to win, and for much the same reasons or lack thereof as we have for this, No Win War III. If we were not allowed, FROM THE FIRST, to fight it as an actual WAR, and fight to win, then why bother? Now it is a nation-building exercise, the same thing we, here on FR for longer than six months, tore up Billy Jeff Blythe about when HE did it. But I forget, the current guy has an (R) by his name so that makes all the difference.

And I support Dr. Paul for the simple reason that HE has his priorities straight: defend this nation and our Constitutional Republic from ALL its enemies, even those who would tear up our Constitution and give all our liberties over to big government, just because they don’t know what else to do. Remember, there is no terrorist in the world who can take away our freedom and our country... only we can do it to ourselves... and too many of you are too willing to give MY liberty away along with your own.

And, yes, this is a CONSERVATIVE site. Dedicated, according to its founder, to conserving our Constitution and the Republic the Founding Dads gave us. What do YOU want to conserve? Besides big government, I mean...


33 posted on 09/06/2007 11:34:12 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: dcwusmc

Bravo...

I suddenly love PAULitics!


36 posted on 09/06/2007 11:45:33 PM PDT by Et in Arcadia Ego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dcwusmc
Even according to Bush, we celebrated “mission accomplished” a couple years ago, actually only several months after the war started. Why are we still there, getting our troops killed to no purpose or court martialling them for doing the job they’re trained to do?

We won the War...The people cheered and stood behind Bush 90%. Then came the Nation Building Police Action...The people booed, loudly, and stand behind Bush 29%.(up 3% on surge..now dropping again.)

Reduce our enemies ability by bombing em till their rubble bounces...this includes Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia Afghanistan and yes, parts of Pakistan. Target the wealthy Sunnis who finance Al-Qaida and the wealthy Shiites who finance Hezbollah ...Then watch the Qaddafi effect...Then return to base...park the planes and repeat when necessary.

Disallow any and all immigration to this country from any Muslim country. Deport all non citizen Muslims and keep as close an eye on the remaining ones as well as we did the Japanese American in 1942. Secure our borders.

Putting ground troops in these countries to institute democracy is a fools errand and will result in one long quagmire.

Even if successful, the newly empowered democratic Arabs will elect the Muslim fundamentalist entities that are our enemies.

37 posted on 09/06/2007 11:45:36 PM PDT by KDD (A nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dcwusmc

‘Even according to Bush, we celebrated “mission accomplished” a couple years ago, actually only several months after the war started.’

If you are going to accuse other posters of ‘lying’ you should NEVER have posted the above.

Thats straight out of DNC headquarters talking point memo’s, that have been debunked repeatedly.

The battle group he was visiting DID ACCOMPLISH THEIR MISSION.

You wonder why nobody outside of fringe group text messaging fanatics take Ron Paul seriously?

Because your tactics resemble the far leftwingnuts of moveon.org, DU, and daily kos when you make that kind of illogical, factually incorrect assertion.

And then say others are ‘lying about Ron Paul’?

Puleeeeeze.


106 posted on 09/07/2007 7:36:35 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dcwusmc; KDD
dcwusmc: His policy is to get our troops out of Iraq. Even according to Bush, we celebrated “mission accomplished” a couple years ago, actually only several months after the war started.

KDD: Reduce our enemies ability by bombing em till their rubble bounces...this includes Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia Afghanistan and yes, parts of Pakistan. Target the wealthy Sunnis who finance Al-Qaida and the wealthy Shiites who finance Hezbollah ...Then watch the Qaddafi effect...Then return to base...park the planes and repeat when necessary.

Disallow any and all immigration to this country from any Muslim country. Deport all non citizen Muslims and keep as close an eye on the remaining ones as well as we did the Japanese American in 1942. Secure our borders.

Putting ground troops in these countries to institute democracy is a fools errand and will result in one long quagmire.

Even if successful, the newly empowered democratic Arabs will elect the Muslim fundamentalist entities that are our enemies.

I agree...Be nice if the CIC was required to have his combat ribbon.

It might slow down the rush to War.

I think you both already know this, but Paul’s policy isn’t to get the troops our of Iraq, or end nationbuilding. That’s closer to Hillary’s policy, she’s a lot more moderate on the war than Paul.

Ron Paul’s policy is to get the troops out of Iraq and out of Kuwait and out of Qatar and out of the UAE and out of Bahrain and out of Afghanistan. In short, remove our military presence from the middle east , land, sea, air. That will solve the problem. The terrorists will be happy, we’ll be happy, we’ll all trade with each other and maybe sing Kumbaya.

KDD, Paul has explained that there is no religious component to terrorism. It’s a function of American occupation in the region. Not radical Islam. Rendering your implication that Paul would somehow favor deporting Muslims absurd.

Personally I think military service is an asset, though I wouldn’t amend the Constitution to require it.

KDD, you’re suggestion that the CIC be required to have earned the Combat Action Ribbon, cute idea, but Ron Paul doesn’t have it. In fact it narrows the current field of both parties to John McCain and only John McCain, since it’s a Navy/Marine award. John Kerry could run for the Dems I suppose.

Your standard, who do you support, McCain or Kerry? McCain for me, but Kerry’s a lot closer to Paul’s position on the war.

I’d go with the National Defense Service Medal next time, that way Paul can stay in the race though you'll eliminate a lot of 70s and 80s vets.

107 posted on 09/07/2007 7:58:11 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson