Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RDTF

Mount Kisco isn’t “wealthy” in the way Bedford and Chappaqua are. While Kisco has a number of fairly affluent areas (although not as wealthy as Chappaqua or Bedford), the other half of the town is filled with housing projects (which get periodic drug raids) and dilapidated slums that pack unsafe numbers of illegals and/or their families into small spaces. Periodically ICE or local authorities have targeted an apartment or two, but the illegal problem persists because people STILL hire them in the area. It’s still not as bad as Peekskill or Brewster (or Port Chester or Mamaroneck) but I would say the town ranks high as being a hotspot for illegals.

As a former resident, I can attest to the problem with illegals. Occasionally I would find their garbage littering the woods near my house (many of them are homeless and take the liberty of sleeping in Leonard Park and in small wooded areas on private property!)


39 posted on 09/07/2007 8:06:08 AM PDT by abt87 (Liberals aren't stupid...they can still beat Koko the monkey in chess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: abt87

Actually, the worst towns period in Taxchester are Mount Vermin and Yonkers.


43 posted on 09/07/2007 9:48:33 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson