Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
"Broussard broke into Leggalet's car in February 2006. He smashed the window and stole a cell phone and other valuables. When a bystander identified Broussard to police and Leggalet as the perpetrator, Leggalet's cell phone was attached to Broussard's belt. Broussard still denied involvement, though. The officer placed a call to Leggalet's telephone number. When the phone on Broussard's belt rang, Broussard was arrested."

LMAO!!

There is a curious part of this paragraph though. It is where a bystander identified Broussard to the police, and Leggalet as the perpetrator. Leggalet was the victim.

4 posted on 09/06/2007 8:26:42 AM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise
It is where a bystander identified Broussard to the police, and Leggalet

A poorly written sentence, but you added a comma. They meant: The bystander identified Broussard to (police and Leggalet) as the perpetrator. ;)

7 posted on 09/06/2007 8:30:55 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson