Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Wall Street Trader Draws Some Subprime Lessons: Michael Lewis
Bloomberg | 09/05/2007 | Michael Lewis

Posted on 09/06/2007 7:04:38 AM PDT by Phantom Lord

A Wall Street Trader Draws Some Subprime Lessons: Michael Lewis


Bloomberg can not be posted here.


Full commentary here


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bloomberg; michaellewis; money; mortgage; poor; subprime; vulturegram
Great article. Read it over and over. Forward it to friends, family, and enemies.
1 posted on 09/06/2007 7:04:39 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Whenever I hear someone crowing about "giving back" I can't escape the thought they're the beneficiary of some ill gotten gain and are returning something like .00001% of what they walked off. For their generosity they expect to be treated like God's gift to the human race.

I'll be happy to stand corrected if somebody can point out that his hedge fund was lending at less than prime rates to his sub prime borrowers but I suspect he was realizing a generous rate of return (probably further leveraged) and was being very well compensated as long as the gravy train was rolling.

2 posted on 09/06/2007 7:25:39 AM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caltrop

The hedge fund didn’t technically lend a dime. What they did was purchase existing loans from lenders to get them off their warehouse line to free up more money for them to lend to more borrowers.


3 posted on 09/06/2007 7:31:54 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

What a great article. This guy is right.


4 posted on 09/06/2007 7:44:42 AM PDT by learner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
So right after the Bear Stearns funds blew up, I had a thought: This is what happens when you lend money to poor people.

BS ALERT!!!! It was not the "poor." It was the greedy and people who had no hope to pay these mortgages. There are alot of "rich" people in that category...

5 posted on 09/06/2007 7:51:15 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I did subprime mortgages for 10 years, ending 1.5 years ago.

I can count the number of "rich" people I did these mortgage for on one hand.

6 posted on 09/06/2007 7:53:11 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I can count the number of "rich" people I did these mortgage for on one hand.

I can count that many greedy rich sub prime borrowers from 1 article....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1887201/posts

7 posted on 09/06/2007 8:00:07 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I read the article from top to bottom. Did not find a single mention of sub-prime mortgages or any evidence that any property in the article was purchsaed with one.

Nice try.

8 posted on 09/06/2007 8:05:12 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

Excellent article.


9 posted on 09/06/2007 8:07:56 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

LMAO. Hilarious article and unfortunately true. I think the biggest mistake the mortgage people made was inventing this neutral word “subprime.” We used to call it B-C-D lending, making it clear that these borrowers had bad credit histories that most lenders would not touch with a ten foot pole. Investors found it too easy to ignore that and just reassure themselves that “subprime” was OK.


10 posted on 09/06/2007 8:08:34 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Thanks anyway, Nancy, but we already have a Commander-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

Wow, that’s good reading.


11 posted on 09/06/2007 8:10:47 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Libs: killing a windfarm is bad, letting a gal die in your Caddy is not so bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I read the article from top to bottom. Did not find a single mention of sub-prime mortgages or any evidence that any property in the article was purchsaed with one.

Yeah - I am sure ALL these loans were 30 year fixed with a 20% downpayment and the bank verified that she could afford with her verified income...

She hangs up the phone and deflates. It's not been her lucky year. Banks threaten to repossess six of seven investment properties. She slashed millions off prices, but still no buyers. Of her 40 home listings, no sales are pending.

But she wears diamonds and drives a Cadillac and lives in a million dollar home (is that poor to you?)...

12 posted on 09/06/2007 8:19:13 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: caltrop

The writer is also an author of books, and having read “Liar’s Poker”, I think it’s a pretty safe bet to say that he wrote this article with satiric intent.


13 posted on 09/06/2007 8:21:42 AM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

I think some are missing that this piece is dripping with sarcasm and is largely a satirical work. Lewis makes points on both sides of the argument in the process. To strongly agree or disagree with him is to fall into his trap and become a target of his derision.


14 posted on 09/06/2007 8:22:01 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Yeah - I am sure ALL these loans were 30 year fixed with a 20% downpayment and the bank verified that she could afford with her verified income

You don't get to make up your own definitions for what constitutes what.

It appears you are trying to claim any loan that is an ARM and has less than 20% equity a "sub-prime" loan.

That is simply and absolutely false.

15 posted on 09/06/2007 8:22:02 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff F

I mostly operate in sarcasm and love it. One of the reason I so like this article.


16 posted on 09/06/2007 8:22:45 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

I see we have the take on this.


17 posted on 09/06/2007 8:22:50 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

To reshape a line from Harry Meet Sally, Sarcasm is more important than sex — after all, how many days have you gone without some sarcasm.


18 posted on 09/06/2007 8:26:42 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff F

Arrgh — make that “When Harry Met Sally”


19 posted on 09/06/2007 8:28:22 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

20 posted on 09/06/2007 8:44:31 AM PDT by Gritty (Politics is the second oldest profession. It bears a striking resemblance to the first-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson