And when research is attempted and funding provided, don't shut the work down like what they did ( again ).
Provide scientific evidence, not religious belief, and you will be listened to.
And no, this isn't Bill, are you Dawkins ?
How did you know which "Bill" I was referring to?
And no, I am not "Dawkins." I don't even live in England and I have never even read his writings. I practice archaeology and related fields in the western US.
When it comes to ID and creation "science" -- well, I was born at night, but not last night! Again: Provide scientific evidence, not religious belief, and you will be listened to.
Methinks thou doth protest too much. You are here...bashing a victim of scientific supression...
And why?
Because Evolutionary Informatics (an information-theory branch of computer science) frightens your weak personal beliefs.
Which is to say: Darwinism is *that* fragile that it must be propped up with lies...and when the lies fail...it's challengers must be personally and professionally attacked.
Darwin's evolutionary theory is biological...so it is telling that you react so strongly to even moderate developments in computer science (information theory).
But react you must, as you are wedded to Darwinism and its offshoots even at the expense of the search for truth.
That a science such as information theory can threaten a *biological* theory like Evolution would be humorous were not the academic climate so clouded by hails to Darwinism.