Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson announces candidacy for president
CNN ^ | September 5, 2007 | Candy Crowley and John King

Posted on 09/05/2007 7:56:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

After spending months testing the waters for a presidential run, Sen. Fred Thompson has made his candidacy official.

"I am running for president of the United States," he said during a taping of NBC's "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno," drawing applause and cheers from the audience.

Thompson will also talk about his decision to join the race for the Republican presidential nomination in a webcast scheduled to go online early Thursday.

A five-day campaign tour will follow Thompson's announcement, sources said last week.

Thompson will stump in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida. Then it's on to Lawrenceburg, Tennessee -- his hometown -- for a "homecoming" on September 15, the sources said.

Political observers say Thompson may be late entering the race. The first voting is only four months away and the others have been in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and beyond for months.

"Expectations are sky high, which means he better perform flawlessly out of the box or a lot of people are going to start grumbling that he's not the great savior we thought he was," said Republican pollster Whit Ayres.

Thompson created a fundraising committee that allowed him to begin raising money for a possible presidential campaign on June 1. He's angling for a conservative base that hasn't coalesced around one candidate.

During his speeches this summer, he has promised his commitment to outlaw abortion is more than lip service.

"I don't think as the president you can do anything halfway," Thompson said in August.

On Iraq, he's in no rush to talk about bringing troops home. "Right now we need to make every effort to make sure that we don't get run out of there with our tails between our legs," Thompson said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; alreadyposted; castyoureyesright; electionpresident; elections; fredthompson; gop; ia2008; iraq; jayleno; nh2008; primaries; prolife; republicans; seebreakingnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: A_Tradition_Continues

your reply makes too much sense for many on this forum!

/s

i’d be more concerned if people were not thinking ahead.


61 posted on 09/05/2007 9:05:51 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

FRED ROCKS!!!!!!!

WOOT!!!!!


62 posted on 09/05/2007 9:07:51 PM PDT by RedOhioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat
I googled "CFR members",,,,and this site shows he was a member. If this site was wrong, then I can't vouch for the other members either, then.

http://www.thought-criminal.org/2007/08/15/cfr-stacks-the-deck-with-both-democrat-and-republican-presidential-candidates

63 posted on 09/05/2007 9:08:04 PM PDT by stockstrader (We need a conservative nominee who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal one who will DIVIDE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Jay Leno??? lol


64 posted on 09/05/2007 9:08:53 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Just ‘googled’ “Reagan CFR”—and he was the last President to NOT be a member. Ford, Nixon, Bush41 were all members.


65 posted on 09/05/2007 9:10:28 PM PDT by stockstrader (We need a conservative nominee who will UNITE the Party, not a liberal one who will DIVIDE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: All

That was awesome!

FRED ROCKS!!!!!!


66 posted on 09/05/2007 9:19:43 PM PDT by RedOhioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Jay Leno??

DId it already happen??


67 posted on 09/05/2007 9:21:47 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Say hello to our next President!

GO FRED GO!


68 posted on 09/05/2007 9:28:11 PM PDT by RedOhioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Hornet19
yep, your right, i’m just a moonbat

See, you're part way there already! Admitting your problem is the first step to solving it.

69 posted on 09/05/2007 9:52:21 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

He won an election.


70 posted on 09/05/2007 9:52:53 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Why is the word “president” lower-case early in this brief article?

Capitalization rules are tricky, though I will agree with you that the phrase "President of the United States" should certainly have been capitalized. I've not read any good formulation of when terms like "President", "Court", and "Constitution" should be capitalized though I would guess a good rule would be that:

  1. The term "President" should be capitalized when used as a title along with a name (e.g. President Reagan).
  2. The phrases "President of the United States", "Supreme Court of the United States", and "Constitution of the United States" should be capitalized.
  3. The terms "President", "Court", and "Constitution" should be capitalized when they are used as shorthand substitutes for the above.
  4. They should not be capitalized, other than in presidential titles, in circumstances where substituting the long form in (2) wouldn't make sense, e.g., "Calderon and Bush are the presidents of Mexico and the U.S., respectively."
Note, btw, that the authors of the Constitution capitalized nearly all nouns therein, so as not to impart any particular meaning to the choice of what words are, or are not, capitalized.
71 posted on 09/05/2007 9:53:22 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

damn....I thought you were like 30 or so FMDJ?


72 posted on 09/05/2007 10:28:33 PM PDT by wardaddy (the future of the West is bleak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

33 as of last week. And my pop culture refs run a lot older than that.


73 posted on 09/05/2007 10:33:29 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I salute you...most young whipper snappers yer age wouldn’t even know which bed the Petries slept in.


74 posted on 09/05/2007 11:01:23 PM PDT by wardaddy (the future of the West is bleak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

It’s weird, we were about the earliest folks in Nashville to get cable, almost a quarter-century ago (remember Viacom ?), back when it was all of 36 channels, most of which were Community Access and non-stations (only 3 movie channels, HBO/Showtime/Cinemax, and Disney was a premium channel that had yet to launch). The ‘60s tv reruns I watched at the time were scarcely 15 years old or so. It would be like a kid watching “Fresh Prince” reruns from 1992 today. It’s weird watching some shows I used to see on OnDemand’s TubeTime as a little kid in primetime that are now pushing 30.

Of course, probably should’ve spent a little less time in front of the cable and more time out living life.


75 posted on 09/05/2007 11:16:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Ron Paul is a libertarian, and has some beliefs that appeal to me like eliminating several departments of the Federal Government. However, eliminating the CIA and DHS is an absurd idea, as well as his concept of foreign policy. He reminds me of the American Firsters from the 1930s that think the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans will protect us from evil.
Huckabee shined in the debate last night. His debate with Paul was great.
76 posted on 09/06/2007 4:39:51 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Clinton slime machine will now go into action. They will find people who will lie about made-up events that never took place 30 years ago. They will comb through everything that he ever said or wrote in their stalinist desire to destroy him.


77 posted on 09/06/2007 4:49:19 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues
It’s been almost ten years since I did much reading about the CFR, and I travel too much globally myself to pack all of my once-read texts. Right now I have a shipment of 451 of my personal books in storage at the port facilities in Shanghai, China, and I’m working those through the customs procedures just to get them to my place. We have lived and labored in Asia since 1989.

I do realize that anyone can apply for membership in the CFR. I was a member of the IRI (International Republican Institute) for some years. But I’ve done substantial reading on the CFR, and, NO, not all from the John Birch Society, but from varied sources. I believe that there are upper echelons of those kinds of organizations (I'm not necessarily referring to the IRI) that are secretive and have views and intentions not consistent with American national sovereignty. I don’t believe they would discuss this on their web site. and I believe that people could be life-long members, even contributing members, and not know of much that is happening at the top.

78 posted on 09/06/2007 5:01:55 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative

You totally misread my post, I am FRed supporter and was just expressing CONCERN.


79 posted on 09/06/2007 5:55:08 AM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

Did you ever consider that, just maybe, I was expressing concern about him?

I support FRed 100% and didn’t realize some people were so sensitive about what is posted about him. Sorry you misinterpreted my post.


80 posted on 09/06/2007 6:01:46 AM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson