There's a giant, and the rest are just midgets.
Posted on 09/05/2007 2:19:55 PM PDT by elizabetty
Jim Mills' departure from the Thompson campaign is actually even bigger than it looks. Not that Thompson couldn't function without Mills — he only been in the office for a week, I understand — but the aftershocks are huge.
You're seeing complaints like this, from the innermost of Thompson's inner circle, as told to Fox News:
When Thompson appears on Jay Leno tonight it will mark the campaigns complete repudiation of a new media campaign strategy and announcement plan that the original Fredheads had designed over several months and finalized in August. More resignations of key founding Fredheads are coming. Soon NONE of the people who got the buzz started in March may remain.
Thompson did Leno in June and numerous senior aides said at the time he would "never return to Hollywood to announce — that's what McCain did! We won't use video, that's what Hillary did. We will let Fred be Fred. We are launching from the (Grand Ole) Opry then hitting New Hampshire and Iowa."
Now they are copying both McCain and Hilary by appearing on Leno and a video. The original Fredheads are no longer angry or frustrated; most have been fired already or given up. ~Snip~
(Excerpt) Read more at campaignspot.nationalreview.com ...
Who does the firing? Why? When will it stop? And, who really runs the campaign?
Things we don’t know and will never know.
Some 'Inside the Beltway' journalist/producer/insider losing a job will never bring me to tears. I wish the whole damned lot of them would find themselves out on the street looking ofr HONEST work. The country would be a sight better of.
Either way, Barnes is utterly useless, just another shill for the Beltway crowd.
I dunno, but it better last the debate. Or should it say butter last...
Why Leno? He’s largely irrelevant. It’s not like announcing on Carson would have been.
http://blogs.thestate.com/bradwarthensblog/2007/07/mccain-2008reag.html
1980 REAGAN
CAMPAIGN SHAKE-UP
During 1980 Campaign, Reagan “Had To Overcome Doubts About His Age And Ability, An Ill-Advised Iowa Strategy, A Major Staff Shake-Up In The Middle Of The Campaign And Serious Money Problems.” “It is true that Reagan entered the campaign with enormous assets. … But Reagan had to overcome doubts about his age and ability, an ill-advised Iowa strategy, a major staff shake-up in the middle of the campaign and serious money problems.” (Lou Cannon, “Reagan: Iowa Loss Allowed Him To Campaign His Way,” The Washington Post, 6/1/80)
“The Shake-Up Of His Campaign Staff” Seen As Contributing Factor To Reagan’s Primary Victory. “The shake-up of his campaign staff and his more personal style of campaigning have contributed to Reagan’s commanding lead for the Republican nomination. To William J. Casey, Ronald Reagan’s reconstructed campaign proves that even in election politics, one can ‘make a virtue out of necessity.’ … Casey … was referring to the recent radical changes in the former California governor’s campaign strategy and staff operations.” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)
Reagan Struggled With Early Fundraising
In July 1979, Fundraising Reports Placed Reagan Fourth Among Republican Presidential Candidates, While First In Spending. “Ronald Reagan, regarded as a leading candidate for the 1980 Republican presidential nomination, is trailing other GOP candidates in financial contributions this year, according to federal reports. The Federal Election Commission said Wednesday that Reagan’s campaign committee has reported $1.4 million in contributions so far this year. That compares with these other GOP presidential contenders and the funds they have reported raising: Rep. Philip M. Crane of Illinois, $2.5 million. Former Texas Gov. John Connally, $2.2 million. Former CIA Director George Bush, $1.5 million. … And although Reagan wasn’t the leading fund-raiser, he was the biggest spender, using nearly $1.3 million of the $1.4 million he raised.” (“Washington Dateline,” The Associated Press, 7/19/79)
· “While It Has A $121,000 Cash Surplus, According To The Latest Campaign Finance Reports, The Reagan Campaign Committee Has $141,741 In Debts And Obligations, Much Of It Owed To A West Coast Direct Mail Firm.” (Fred Barbash, “Reagan Raises $1.4 Million In Campaign Funds,” The Washington Post, 7/26/79)
In August 1979, “[L]yn Nofziger, A Longtime Reagan Aide, Was Removed As Finance Director.” (Bill Peterson, “Specter of Kennedy Casts Shadow On GOP Politics,” The Washington Post, 9/23/79)
By September Of 1979, Reagan’s Campaign Was $500,000 In Debt. “The only serious weakness in the Reagan effort is fund raising. In late August, the campaign found itself almost $500,000 in debt …” (Bill Peterson, “Specter of Kennedy Casts Shadow On GOP Politics,” The Washington Post, 9/23/79)
In January 1980, Reagan’s Campaign Abandoned Plans To Run The Campaign Without Federal Matching Funds And The Corresponding Spending Limits, After Coming To The “[R]ealization That Its Fundraisers Could Not Gather Enough Contributions To Run The Campaign Without Federal Money …” “Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign yesterday accepted a federal check for $100,000, ending weeks of internal debate over whether Reagan should accept federal matching funds and the spending limits that go with them. It was the Reagan campaign’s first such check. Its second will be far larger. … The decision reflects the Reagan campaign’s realization that its fundraisers could not gather enough contributions to run the campaign without federal money, campaign treasurer Bay Buchanan said. ‘Our feeling was, don’t take matching funds until you have to, she said.” (“GOP Chairman Says It’s Time For Debate on U.S. Hostages,” The Washington Post, 1/26/80)
As Voting Period Approached, Reagan Had Staff Shakeup
In Late 1979, Then-Campaign Director John Sears “Eased Out” Group Of Longtime Reagan Advisers, Including Lyn Nofziger And Mike Deaver. “Recently, three of Reagan’s oldest and most conservative advisers – deputy campaign chairmen Lyn Nofziger and Mike Deaver, and issues man Marty Anderson – have been eased out of his campaign by John Sears, the pragmatic chairman. Some Reagan loyalists worry that the changes portend a more moderate campaign tack, thus alienating hardline conservatives.” (“The Bumpy Campaign Trail,” Newsweek, 12/17/79)
Deaver’s Dismissal Left Sears In “Undisputed Control Of The Campaign.” “Three topsiders in Ronald Reagan’s Presidential campaign have been pushed overboard in the last three months … Such fears were given new credence last week when Michael Deaver, a friend and conservative adviser to Reagan for fourteen years, was forced out of the campaign because he had been operating outside the chain of command of manager John Sears, who now stands in undisputed control of the campaign.” (Dennis Williams, “Reagan’s Campaign Shake-Up,” Newsweek, 12/10/79)
After Losing Iowa Caucuses, Reagan Fired Campaign Manager And Entire Top Layer Of Political Aides
1980: After Losing Iowa Caucuses, Then-Gov. Ronald Reagan Vowed – According To A Campaign Aide – “There’s Going To Be Some Changes.” “As Ronald Reagan sees it, the seeds of his victory in the Republican presidential contest were sown in the dark hours of defeat after the Iowa precinct caucuses last Jan. 21. … Chief of staff Edwin Meese recalls Reagan saying grimly to him the same night, ‘There’s going to be some changes.’” (Lou Cannon, “Reagan: Iowa Loss Allowed Him To Campaign His Way,” The Washington Post, 6/1/80)
On Day Of New Hampshire Primary, Reagan Dismissed Campaign Manager, Political Director And Press Secretary. “Feb. 26, New Hampshire – Reagan defeats Bush nearly 2 to 1 and regains his status as front-runner. The afternoon of his victory he fires Sears, political director Charles Black and press secretary Jim Lake in a shakeup that in effect restored Reagan as head of his own campaign. Former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman William J. Casey is brought in as campaign director and Meese, whose Sears’ attempt to fire triggered the timing of his own dismissal, becomes chief of staff.” (Lou Cannon, “Reagan: Iowa Loss Allowed Him To Campaign His Way,” The Washington Post, 6/1/80)
Dismissal Of Sears Triggered “Massive Housecleaning Of The Reagan Operation. “Sears, the campaign’s executive vice chairman and chief strategist until he was fired on Feb. 26, antagonized many of Reagan’s conservative backers and California friends by attempting to package the candidate in too moderate a guise and devising his unsuccessful low profile Iowa campaign. … On the day of the primary, Sears was summarily fired, along with two of his closest associates … Several other campaign aides aligned with Sears also left, either voluntarily or by request, in what amounted to a massive housecleaning of the Reagan operation.” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)
· Dismissed Reagan Staffer: “We Had No Idea … That This Was Going To Happen.” “A member of Reagan’s Washington office, who was among those let go, said the dismissals came as a surprise. ‘We knew there was contention, but we had no idea how bad it was or that this was going to happen.’” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)
· Then-Rep. And Reagan Supporter Jack Kemp (R-NY): “It was a blessing in disguise; it really shook up the candidate and the troops … Maybe it will be remembered as a loss which led to ultimate victory.” (Dom Bonafede, “The ‘Liberation’ Of Ronald Reagan – A New Staff And A New Strategy,” National Journal, 3/22/80)
LOL Aftershocks my arse! Mills was a hired gun. The anti-Fredheads are desperate. They're grabbing for anything that looks remotely viable for attack purposes. Pathetic.
Excellent post. Thanks
..anyway, I’ve chose to pull for the Cox/Craig ticket.
Happens all the time at Thompson Campaign Headquarters, that is.
There's a giant, and the rest are just midgets.
Just have Fred drive that old truck he went to work in everyday at the Senate, park in close as possible to the White House and say” I’m Fred Thompson and I’m running for President. I need your vote so me and the missus can move in over there”. (points to the WH)
If that ain’t the truth. LOL
Point made, that's what happens when your the last one to even start an exploratory champaign, your left picking over what's left while the best qualified one's are working for someone else.
I'm not saying this is the case this time.
From Geraghty on July 27, 2007
Jim Mills is joining Team Fred?
Jim Mills is joining Team Fred? Jim Mills?
The reaction among those who don’t know him will be “Ah, a Fox News producer is joining the Thompson campaign, so much for ‘fair and balanced,’ blah blah blah.” For those of us who have encountered Mills on Capitol Hill, there will be a lot of raised eyebrows. Mills is something of a local legend in the Capitol Hill press corps - very smart, tenacious but fair questioner, relentless energy. He somehow manages to have a good relationship with lawmakers while asking them how they got their hand caught in the cookie jar, pointing out that their answer contradicts what they said yesterday with a friendly smile on his face.
One instinctively wonders how Mills will handle the transition from asking questions to answering them, but this is a very impressive hire for Team Fred.
I’ll just save this for later.
Well with the onset of the “anti-FredHeads are desparate” comments, it was hinting in the direction that a debate might erupt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.