Skip to comments.
Ron Paul Will Win Debate But Be Discredited
TransWorldNews ^
| 9/5/2007 3:27 PM GMT
| USA Election Polls
Posted on 09/05/2007 11:36:53 AM PDT by rface
New Hampshire: (Top Story)
USAElectionPolls.com has recently posted an article on their web site entitled "Republican Debate - Five Things to Expect" and they claim that Ron Paul will be the winner of the online text poll / internet poll but be ignored. This is not shocking news when you consider that Ron Paul has fared extremely well in every post-debate poll and there is little reason to believe that this debate will be any different.
Ron Paul received an incredible boost to his campaign in the last Fox News debate held in New Hampshire with his claim that "blowback" is the cause of hatred towards the United States.
USAElectionPolls.com ran an analysis on the very last ABC News debate and found that Ron Paul was limited to only 6% of the total speaking time of a total of nine candidates. A fair debate would have had each candidate speak roughly 11% of the time; suggesting that Ron Paul was unfairly treated by a factor of two. (Source).
USAElectionPolls.com receives approximately 80,000 unique monthly visitors according to Quantcast.com and in their informal online straw poll; Ron Paul has received over 8,000 votes in two weeks -- almost 25 times more than his next closest Republican competitor Mitt Romney.
If a website as popular as USAElectionPolls.com shows an impressive margin of victory for a candidate, it should not be taken lightly.
Visit http://www.usaelectionpolls.com.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chickensforronpaul; cutnrunronpaul; dopesmokersfrronpaul; gaysforronpaul; gopdebates; nutburger; paulestinians; potheadsforronpaul; proalqaedaronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: rface
Ron Paul will be the winner of the online text poll / internet poll but be ignored. Of course the Internet polls will be ignored, Ronnie and the Paulettes have the process of spamming them down to a science.
21
posted on
09/05/2007 12:01:00 PM PDT
by
Pistolshot
(Every woman, who can, should learn to shoot, and carry a gun.)
To: Chi-townChief
"Sadly, Paul discredits himself when he borrows the language of the left."
But the leading GOP candidate doesn't when he poses as the left's champion??
22
posted on
09/05/2007 12:01:05 PM PDT
by
FreeInWV
To: Petronski
do you think I would "kid" about Ron Paul?
Get serius
23
posted on
09/05/2007 12:02:06 PM PDT
by
rface
(kooky inside and out)
To: rface
If a website as popular as USAElectionPolls.com shows an impressive margin of victory for a candidate, it should not be taken lightly.************
LOL! Too funny.
24
posted on
09/05/2007 12:02:59 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Pistolshot
The one thing you can count on is Pat Paulson will lose the debate and the 10 FReeper supporters will post 100 Threads claiming the opposite. That you can take to the Bank.
Pray for W and Our Troops
25
posted on
09/05/2007 12:04:47 PM PDT
by
bray
(Member of the FR President Bush underground fighting FR BDS)
To: Allegra
Wow, the people at the Ron Paul
forum are actually in favor of this bumper sticker, "pass them out at the mosques" indeed
To: rface
>> I think this is a Graph showing the growth in Ron Paul’s support:
Stop it! You jack up my BP with these things! ;-)
(I keep forgetting you’re just yanking the ol’ chain...)
To: FreeInWV
To: scott7278
“This is not a Top Story...maybe a Top Editorial.”
Put it in Bloggers.
29
posted on
09/05/2007 12:10:02 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: Dan Cooper
I think they mean Ron Paul the TERRORISTS HOPE for America
30
posted on
09/05/2007 12:11:46 PM PDT
by
John D
To: Dan Cooper
Yep...he’s the Qaeda Candidate! I think Ahmadinejad kind of digs him, too. ;-)
31
posted on
09/05/2007 12:13:10 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(Turning Vanity Threads Into New Socks Threads at Every Opportunity)
To: Chi-townChief
That is ridiculous.
Noone on the left fights for the 2nd amendment and against the 16th amendment.
Your entire argument is in his views of non-intervention.
But why is it that when it comes to foreign policy - modern day republicans don’t believe in conservatism?
All of a sudden government is efficient?
32
posted on
09/05/2007 12:15:33 PM PDT
by
eboyer
To: eboyer
Don’t expect anything but frothing and keyword vandalism from the rabid anti-Ron Paul crowd.
33
posted on
09/05/2007 12:18:56 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: rface
Fists raised and moving up and down, “get out now! Just leave today”
Ron Paul=Adult Moron
34
posted on
09/05/2007 12:20:37 PM PDT
by
The Forgotten Man
(He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
To: rface
Paul could walk onto the stage, hit his head on the podium and be out cold for the entire debate, and his internet followers would still declare him the winner.
35
posted on
09/05/2007 12:23:03 PM PDT
by
rightwingintelligentsia
(You know a liberal has lost the argument when he calls you a Nazi.)
To: elizabetty
I think he’s been discredited by his apologias for al Qaeda. Any man running for president who gives a hoot about al Qaeda’s grievances, is with best intentions as naive as stupid as Jimmy Carter and at worst an enemy of the USA.
36
posted on
09/05/2007 12:23:13 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: Allegra
There is also this Ron Paul site.
www.outlawjournalism.com
They're nuts.
37
posted on
09/05/2007 12:24:21 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: bray
No kidding. They’re an energetic lot, but highly delusional.
38
posted on
09/05/2007 12:25:43 PM PDT
by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: rface
">
39
posted on
09/05/2007 12:26:23 PM PDT
by
ulm1
(“There are scandals that need to be addressed. Republicans address them, Democrats re-elect them.”)
To: Petronski
Got some blinky-blink going on there now.
I like it!
40
posted on
09/05/2007 12:27:16 PM PDT
by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson