Replies

When RuPaulettes are willing to skew polls to read him winning by a margin of 28% when he is polling nationally at 3% perhaps you should take a step back and realize it's not a matter of couch potatoes verses motivated supporters but a tactic that moonbat liberals use called "by any means necessary"...if that doesn't scare you I don't know what will.

Go and look at the other candidates' Meetups, Facebook, other online sites. Most supporters of other candidates do virtually nothing for their candidate. They don't make brochures, they don't make signs and placards and place them publicly, they don't pay for and create their own highway billboards, they don't do biking or hiking events to help their candidate, they don't have their own candidate internet radio or internet television stations, they don't travel hundreds of miles to meet and support their candidate, well, the list is pretty long.

The RP folk are activists. And we just passed 40,000 in our MeetUp groups alone. I recognize that Romney has tried to do some of this sort of thing but the media is referring to his campaign as a traveling welfare agency, suffering the same hemorrhaging that virtually doomed McStain. Of the remainder, only Fred seems to have the savvy and appeal to create such a grassroots base of real supporters. By that, I mean people who don't consider it their primary act of activism to sit around on their fat butts whining about other candidates and trolling other candidate threads at FreeRepublic.

It's not our fault if your candidates are so lackluster. Stop blaming other people and get out and work for your candidate.

Look, I applaud the RP supporter's enthusiasm and conviction. All candidates should be so lucky to have that kind of support.

But you know and I know it’s the unethical, dirty, kook “by any means necessary”, nasty, vicious, threatening tactics RP supporters use to skew polls, belittle non-supporters, call talk shows and on and on that turns people off to RP. That in its self goes unaddressed by you which makes me think you support that kind of nonsense which is very puzzling to me...and we haven’t even discussed the candidate for God’s sake. In fact, these tactics parallel the lies and distortions used by the DNC, Code Pink, MoveOn.org, ANSWER and NARAL. How in good conscience can you endorse such dishonest tactics? I just don’t get it.

Do you honestly think skewing polls will get your candidate elected? Weren't you embarrassed when the poll in The Des Moines Register had RP up by 58% before the Iowa Straw Poll and he only got 9%? Don't these supporters do more harm to RP's credibility than help?