Well, clearly that is what is going to ultimately to happen.
But the fact is that Craig has disgraced his office and embarrased the good conservative people of his State.
We have the evidence, he has not denied what took place and pled guilty to a lesser charge to make the entire matter go away.
What more evidence would convince you?
Do you go into a men's room and put your feet and hands into an occupied stall?
Do you choose a stall next to one that is occupied when there are empty ones further away?
Do you stand in front of an occupied stall for any amount of time?
To see if a stall is occupied you look under the door, not through the cracks, unless you want to check out what the guy inside looks like.
Now men who have used public restrooms understand there is a certain decorum that goes on and when that decorum is violated there is going to be serious trouble.
The final defense for Craig isn't that he didn't engage in this dispicable behaviour, but like those who stood by Mike Vick, it is, even if he did, what is the big deal'.
He may be guilty as sin...but after listening to the interview tape and reading the transcript...you or I can't base what is alleged....it's hearsay.
OBTW, I do look through the cracks to see if a stall is occupied. I also look under, and if the stall that is cleanest is next to an occupied stall...that's the one I'll pick. And if the whole restroom is gross...I will not not use it.