Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: technomage

I think he was railroaded. If he were a Demo, they would be having a standing ovation for him as they did for Studds.


206 posted on 09/04/2007 7:19:50 PM PDT by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: juliej

WOULD DEMS SAY OK TO LARRY CRAIG?


By J. Grant Swank, Jr.
MichNews.com
Sep 4, 2007


“The Senate Republican campaign chairman said his party responded properly to outgoing Sen. Larry E. Craig's sexual-misconduct case and rejected Democratic claims of a double standard for dealing with other embattled lawmakers,” per Eric Pfeiffer of The Washington Times.

Would Dems have simply nodded off when the Larry Craig twist hit the winds? No doubt.

Dems don’t have the collective moral sensitivity to find anything incorrect, let alone wrong, about what Craig did. Dems are amoral. In reality, Dems stand by an immoral position with such nonchalance that it depicts the ethical bankruptcy of their party.

Factually Dems are not “amoral.” They are “immoral” as such relates to ethical positions, whether religious, cultural or political.

Clinton did what he did with the Monica Lewinsky temptation. Dems stand by him to this day. Dems treat him as a celeb. He is applauded and stroked the more the years roll on. Accountability? None really. Just let Clinton be Clinton and toss out the moral standard. After all, that’s the age we live in.

When it comes to Republicans, however, there is a moral spine at their center. For instance, Republicans stands in the main against killing womb babies. Dems don’t do that; they defend murdering the defenseless innocent ones. They defend such murdering, not subtly, but with outbursts of enthusiasm.

Republicans are pro-family and pro-monogamous heterosexual marriage. Dems are aggressively pro-same gender alliances—unions or ‘marriages’ or whatever pleases their fancy. Dems define ‘family’ as they wish. Homosexual lifestyles are, especially among theologically liberal Dems, divine blessings.

Republicans are pro-biblical morality in every dimension of culture. Dems are not in line with biblical ethics, though they play word games to the contrary. Prime example of late is Barack Obama who touts his church activities and biblical quotes from a black church pulpit. However, that’s all obvious hypocrisy. He quotes Jesus’ statements from the Sermon on the Mount while discounting God’s prohibition of slaying the unborn. Without qualification, Obama preaches post-birth abortion—away from the church pulpit, however.

Republicans support America’s Judeo-Christian heritage. Dems would wipe it out in favor of total secularization. They believe that America “has to grow up” in order to be “modern.” Therefore, erasing orthodox Christianity is at the core of their agenda. Dems would delight in sinking the church. They only use the church for their political campaigns. They thrill at standing behind a sanctuary pulpit, especially before a black congregation. But that’s it. A photo op, nothing biblically sound.

Republicans defend freedom of religious expression. Dems fight it off at every chance, supporting every lawsuit aimed at eliminating ‘Jesus’ and ‘God’ and any reference to Scripture in public places. With that, Dems endorse all other religions but the Judeo-Christian faith.

Therefore, when it comes to Larry Craig. If he were a Dem doing what he did, he would still be in office.
214 posted on 09/04/2007 7:33:57 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson