Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: juliej

WOULD DEMS SAY OK TO LARRY CRAIG?


By J. Grant Swank, Jr.
MichNews.com
Sep 4, 2007


“The Senate Republican campaign chairman said his party responded properly to outgoing Sen. Larry E. Craig's sexual-misconduct case and rejected Democratic claims of a double standard for dealing with other embattled lawmakers,” per Eric Pfeiffer of The Washington Times.

Would Dems have simply nodded off when the Larry Craig twist hit the winds? No doubt.

Dems don’t have the collective moral sensitivity to find anything incorrect, let alone wrong, about what Craig did. Dems are amoral. In reality, Dems stand by an immoral position with such nonchalance that it depicts the ethical bankruptcy of their party.

Factually Dems are not “amoral.” They are “immoral” as such relates to ethical positions, whether religious, cultural or political.

Clinton did what he did with the Monica Lewinsky temptation. Dems stand by him to this day. Dems treat him as a celeb. He is applauded and stroked the more the years roll on. Accountability? None really. Just let Clinton be Clinton and toss out the moral standard. After all, that’s the age we live in.

When it comes to Republicans, however, there is a moral spine at their center. For instance, Republicans stands in the main against killing womb babies. Dems don’t do that; they defend murdering the defenseless innocent ones. They defend such murdering, not subtly, but with outbursts of enthusiasm.

Republicans are pro-family and pro-monogamous heterosexual marriage. Dems are aggressively pro-same gender alliances—unions or ‘marriages’ or whatever pleases their fancy. Dems define ‘family’ as they wish. Homosexual lifestyles are, especially among theologically liberal Dems, divine blessings.

Republicans are pro-biblical morality in every dimension of culture. Dems are not in line with biblical ethics, though they play word games to the contrary. Prime example of late is Barack Obama who touts his church activities and biblical quotes from a black church pulpit. However, that’s all obvious hypocrisy. He quotes Jesus’ statements from the Sermon on the Mount while discounting God’s prohibition of slaying the unborn. Without qualification, Obama preaches post-birth abortion—away from the church pulpit, however.

Republicans support America’s Judeo-Christian heritage. Dems would wipe it out in favor of total secularization. They believe that America “has to grow up” in order to be “modern.” Therefore, erasing orthodox Christianity is at the core of their agenda. Dems would delight in sinking the church. They only use the church for their political campaigns. They thrill at standing behind a sanctuary pulpit, especially before a black congregation. But that’s it. A photo op, nothing biblically sound.

Republicans defend freedom of religious expression. Dems fight it off at every chance, supporting every lawsuit aimed at eliminating ‘Jesus’ and ‘God’ and any reference to Scripture in public places. With that, Dems endorse all other religions but the Judeo-Christian faith.

Therefore, when it comes to Larry Craig. If he were a Dem doing what he did, he would still be in office.
214 posted on 09/04/2007 7:33:57 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: jdm; M. Thatcher
What's fishy is Ben Stein, who I worship, and Rush, who I like, are staunchly in Craig's corner.

I'm starting to think the media can't resist the ratings boost over a protracted Craig GOP food fight.

Especially when you throw Patrick McHenry into the fray.

Unless Stein and Limbaugh have solid proof this was a complete and total setup and Craig doesn't have a gay bone in his body (yeah right) I'm forced to move Ben and Rush into the media whore column.

216 posted on 09/04/2007 7:42:44 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Oh, Geez, do they have to explain this to you again...

Any and all behavior is perfectly OK, as long as you don’t speak out against it and then engage in that very same behavior.

They do have a point about hypocrisy. Then again, based on liberal logic raping and pillaging an entire village would be fine as long as you went easy on the guys who were caught raping and pillaging last year. You know, blame the system, the man, poverty, two America’s and the unfairness of it all that drove those misguided folks to rape and pillage.

Then you can rape and pillage all you want. You have for all intents and purposes purchased raping and pillaging offset credits.


224 posted on 09/04/2007 7:56:59 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson