Posted on 09/04/2007 2:47:22 PM PDT by nypokerface
Take a look at this, as well:
Heart patients to get valves grown from their cells
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1890712/posts
ping!
![]() |
It's a 'Burgh
|
![]() |
|
Send FReepmail if yunz want on/off BPT list, 'n'at | |
Learn Pittsburghese! Free Streaming 'Burgh Radio |
|
The List of Ping Lists |
Smart Yunzers PING, 'n'at.
“Curses! Adult stem cells again!!!”
...what I suspect some biological-research friends will say about
this report
It seems that the real successes in stem cell reparative therapy are coming with adult stem cells - not embryonic stem cells. I don’t watch MSM, but I was wondering if the template about how important these embryonic stem cells were for medical advances had changed any?
Thanks. I didn’t see that post yesterday.
Smart people make the wheels go round in the Burgh.
Stem cells are everywhere. The gut lining regenerates every three days, from stem cells. Even the brain has stem cells. Childrens Hospital has been in business for a long time and is highly competent; good they can do this research.
Adult stem cells does it again.
The pro-aborts will be saddened to see science advance without the need for more killed embryos.
Adult stem cells... oh the humanities!
Excellent...
My son-in-law’s sight was saved by transplants of stem cells from his own eyes. Before too long a large proportion of people will see from their own experience that adult stem cells are producing miracles.
I know that most people don’t understand the difference - or don’t want to in some cases. It’s easy for MSM types to change or delete one word, especially in this matter, and continue to mislead.
The myoendothelial cells also showed no propensity to form tumors, which is a concern with other stem cell therapies.
I think that they might have meant:
The myoendothelial cells also showed no propensity to form tumors, which is a concern with other embryonic stem cell therapies.
I haven't read of any adult stem cell research studies that show any propensity to form tumors similar to what embryonic stem cells seem to do. Might it be possible that there's a lower incidence with adult stem cells that's not being widely reported? I really don't know.
Glad ot hear about your son-in-law’s sight. Very good.
I agree with your comments. The gig is up for embyonic stem cells IMO.
Glad ot hear about your son-in-law’s sight. Very good.
I agree with your comments. The gig is up for embryonic stem cells IMO.
This is obviously a fraud. Everyone knows that only embryoninc stems cells can cure diseases.
It is fiction that embryonic stem cell research is 'illegal'. It is legal in this country if funded with private money.
Now, if embryonic stem cell research had yielded any real results, it would have extensive private funding. That has not been the case. If there was money to be made in embryonic stem cell research, it would receive private funding. It has not, draw your conclusions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.