Posted on 09/04/2007 10:11:21 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
If you want on or off the NM Ping list, please FReepmail me.
Wow. Bill has gone off the deep end....again.
Sweet corn overdose ?
"Iowa, for good reason, for constitutional reasons, for reasons related to the Lord, should be the first caucus and primary."
LOL ... God and religious faith are so foreign to most Democrats that they lapse into incoherence when they try to fake an interest in them.
Obviously, Bill Richardson was feeling a little tired that day, and was free-wheeling at the mouth. Otherwise, the reference to “God’s will” would not have come out.
There is no divine inspiration anywhere for the date of the Iowa caucus, or any primary election. This is entirely the province of politically-driven legislatures and ambitious home-state activists.
Seems to me the guy more than likely designed his comments to be consumed by the local community. His reference to God was probably little more than a tongue in cheek joke.
There are times when I think the political analysis goes way over the top.
I’m not faulting folks here, because the tone of the article didn’t go in this direction, but I do think this is much about nothing.
This is a perfect example a Democrat pandering but doesn’t have the slightest idea in which context to put it.
There is no divine inspiration anywhere for the date of the Iowa caucus, or any primary election.
_________________________
Richardson is apparently not used to discussing faith or thinking in the context of faith. I bet the audience was astonished!
Iowa is the Promised Land? Who knew!?!
I didn’t even know he had a religion. Whatever he was drinking, it must have been the same thing he was drinking when he told his Kansas City Royals history.
Isn’t it amazing how many people speak for God these days? Too bad they are not all saying the same thing.
I just spoke with the author. Not surprisingly, he had no idea that Hillary was going to be under oath soon.
"While Richardson is now a staunch opponent of electoral anarchy -- even a believer in Iowa's divine right to hold the nation's first presidential vote -- he was not always such a traditionalist.
It was Richardson, after all, who scrapped New Mexico's traditional June presidential primary back in 2004, opting for a Democratic caucus to be held on Feb. 3, the same day Arizona held its presidential primary.
And it was Richardson, who while chairman of the Western Governors' Association in 2004, pushed for a resolution calling for Western states to hold their presidential primaries and caucuses on the same date -- either in January or February of 2008, according to an earlier Albuquerque Journal report.
While still an undeclared candidate in August 2006, Richardson felt it necessary to reassure voters in New Hampshire (!) that he would vigorously support New Hampshire's right to hold the first-in-the-nation presidential primary, even though he supported adding a Nevada caucus to the early-voting schedule, the Journal reported at the time.
Interestingly, in the light of Monday's remarks in Iowa, Richardson told New Hampshire voters in 2006 that even if New Hampshire moved its primary up to be ahead of Iowa and Nevada in the schedule, he'd support that too, the Journal reported.
"You're still the number one primary, and there is a difference between a caucus and a primary," Richardson told his audience. "New Hampshire will retain the importance it always has."
A man for all seasons...errr...reasons.
You spoke to Bruce Daniels?
Richardson is the gift that keeps on giving in this presidential race, LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.