Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quick1

” What is NOT within your rights is to search my belongings without my consent, and then detain me when I refuse to allow the search.”

So I guess you are in favor of making it easier for shop lifters to steal? Interesting. There are only two reasons I can think of that would lead you to this conclusion. I imagine you are aware of both of them so I won’t go into them.


295 posted on 09/04/2007 8:32:02 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]


To: monday

No, I’m in favor of keeping my rights. It’s not my fault the store can’t come up with a better security policy to control shoplifting, is it?


298 posted on 09/04/2007 8:34:08 AM PDT by Quick1 (There is no Theory of Evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

To: monday
So I guess you are in favor of making it easier for shop lifters to steal? Interesting. There are only two reasons I can think of that would lead you to this conclusion. I imagine you are aware of both of them so I won’t go into them.

Actually there is a well defined and prescribed way to detain shoplifters for probable cause, but it does not involve post sales receipt checks.

Your position seems to be since I have nothing to hide, I should not object to being searched by a private party though I have done nothing.

312 posted on 09/04/2007 8:45:48 AM PDT by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson