Do you think she will ever testify in this case? under oath? and what does ‘under oath’ mean to her ... she can rationalize giving any answer she wants, depending on the meanin of ‘is.’
The appellate hearing on Sept. 7 is about bringing her back in as a defendant to join her husband. His trial date had already been set for March 27, 2007, but Peter wanted a shot to bring her back as a defendant.
Well, if trial Judge Aurelio Munoz has anything to say about it, she will testify. I was in the courtroom when he said: I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying..........did you hear that, Mr. Kendall.
Yes, Hillary may try her I don’t remember nonsense. We think that it is going to be shown that her sworn declaration was perjury. Unfortunately for her, Peter has several hours of home video of her. No one has ever had that before.