The appellate hearing on Sept. 7 is about bringing her back in as a defendant to join her husband. His trial date had already been set for March 27, 2007, but Peter wanted a shot to bring her back as a defendant.
Well, if trial Judge Aurelio Munoz has anything to say about it, she will testify. I was in the courtroom when he said: I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying..........did you hear that, Mr. Kendall.
Yes, Hillary may try her I don’t remember nonsense. We think that it is going to be shown that her sworn declaration was perjury. Unfortunately for her, Peter has several hours of home video of her. No one has ever had that before.
wellllll, isn’t THAT exciting .. I envy your being able to be in the courtroom for all the fun. Will keep following your threads. Thanks for all you do for us FRepers.
We think that it is going to be shown that her sworn declaration was perjury. Unfortunately for her, Peter has several hours of home video of her. No one has ever had that before.
Doug, please tell me that there are duplicate and authenicated copies of these videos that are also safely tucked away. Just in case, you know...
I haven’t followed this as much as I should have, so you may have answered this sometime back: how did she allow this to happen? Did she have a sack on her head with eyeholes cut out, or what?