Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada ponders polygamy
MercatorNet.com ^ | Monday, 20 August 2007 | Margaret Somerville

Posted on 09/02/2007 8:35:58 PM PDT by monomaniac

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2007 8:35:59 PM PDT by monomaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
I will point out just to rile the Left, that heterosexual polygamy has biblical sanction. Homosexuality does not. The only reason we've had heterosexual monogamous marriage in the West is due to tradition. But if liberals want to abandon tradition to legitimize perversion, I see no reason why polygamy can't be a legal marriage arrangement. After all, the Left has no valid reason to argue against it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 09/02/2007 8:41:49 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Those wives look like they’re about to beat up the hubby just as soon as the photographer leaves the house.


3 posted on 09/02/2007 8:45:24 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Most men find it difficult to take care of one woman. Several would be a challenge! ;-)

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

4 posted on 09/02/2007 8:46:55 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Hey, I need another wife.

I could use some more nagging.

Running, ducking, laughing.

5 posted on 09/02/2007 8:47:38 PM PDT by SIDENET (Inventor of the 12-hour "power nap".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
And I'm sure hubby is absolutely thrilled that he has not one, not two, but THREE mothers-in-law.

Hey, maybe he's boffing them too, and that's why the wives are going to beat him to a pulp, lol
6 posted on 09/02/2007 8:48:21 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Darn those unintended consequences.

Or was the destruction of the basic civilized unit and ultimately the civilization the intent?

Nah, not that.

7 posted on 09/02/2007 8:49:36 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

My wife said I could have another just as soon as she gets her Rolls, unlimited credit card and a beachfront condo.........


8 posted on 09/02/2007 8:51:50 PM PDT by Red Badger (ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

You want equal levels hearing loss in both ears?

Or are you hoping that when you duck the frying pan that gets tossed at you that it hits the other lady?


9 posted on 09/02/2007 8:55:18 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Actually, I would be open to legalize polyamorous relationships. In his book Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Heilein discussed several multipartner format. He made a good case for them under certain circumstances as well.

If we are going to abandon the current monogamous hetrosexual standard, lets at least open it up to more survivable forms and not just gay marriage.


10 posted on 09/02/2007 9:01:51 PM PDT by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Thats what I think too.. if gay marriage is legal then so should polygamy.

To play devil’s advocate even without the gay marriage issue, with the breakdown of the family unit in America and Europe I believe we need to let freedom try out some alternatives.

In the UK I was reading 50% of children are growing up with only one parent. And that usually means one mother, who has to work very long to afford the high rent/housing prices.. thus not much time left for parenting. And a very tired, stressed out parent.


11 posted on 09/02/2007 9:02:43 PM PDT by ran20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
If we were cynical about politicians, we could see the support of gay marriage by some of them as based on getting the social liberal "gay vote" onside and sacrificing the social conservative vote. Legalising polygamy might do the same for the vote of certain ethnic or religious communities at the expense of the social liberal vote (especially that of feminists).

"...certain ethnic or religious communities..." the Canuckistan Funda-Muzzies, mayhaps? Talk about a cautionary tale.

12 posted on 09/02/2007 9:05:23 PM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

The legalization of gay marriage actually makes a better precedent for adult incest than polygamy. Why should I be able to marry my mother if she’s divorced? Or my father for that matter? Love, legal access to government benefits, protection from testimony, yada yada, all the same reasons given for gay marriage.

Don’t be surprised.


13 posted on 09/02/2007 9:28:19 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac
Gay marriage supporters scoffed at the “slippery slope” arguments — that it would lead to polygamy. It didn’t take long to prove them wrong (or, more likely deceitful).

Although self-proclaimed “feminist” organizations claim polygamy would hurt women & benefit men — for the most part, the opposite is true. For every man with a second wife, there must be another that does without altogether. There won't be very many men willing to share wives.

Traditional marriage has been a cornerstone of society. Gay marriage and polygamy will prove to be very disruptive.

14 posted on 09/02/2007 9:29:07 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Those wives look like they’re about to beat up the hubby just as soon as the photographer leaves the house.

Just FYI (since it does not appear to be mentioned in any post on on the thread), that is a shot from HBO's "Big Love".

15 posted on 09/02/2007 9:44:33 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: monomaniac

Are you sure the one on the far right is not a man?


16 posted on 09/02/2007 9:47:44 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Why would you use biblical sanction to prohibit or allow anything? The law is not your religious perogative?


17 posted on 09/02/2007 9:49:46 PM PDT by pierstroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Not really.

Over time you will see what has happened in countries where it is legal - the end result is that not every man will be able to get married.

Rich and powerful men who has the means to take care of multiple wives will secure the young eligible women who are in their child-rearing years leaving behind the older unwanted women for the poor and uneducated.

18 posted on 09/02/2007 9:58:46 PM PDT by expatguy (Support Conservative Blogging - "An American Expat in Southeast Asia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Polygamy in the Bible always met with disaterous results. Even Solomon was corrupted bt his many wives.

That why is Paul wrote.

1 Timothy 3:12
A deacon must be the husband of but one wife and must manage his children and his household well

Titus 1:6
An elder must be blameless, the husband of but one wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient.

Ephesians 5:33
33However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Furthermore God only provided Adam with one wife

Genesis 2
But for Adam [h] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs [i] and closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib [j] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

23 The man said,
“This is now bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called ‘woman, [k] ‘
for she was taken out of man.”

24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.


19 posted on 09/02/2007 10:04:36 PM PDT by Boiler Plate ("Why be difficult, when with a little more effort you can be impossible." - Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Read in the NT what Christ says about marriage. Read what the qualifications for leaders of the church are. Read Genesis and God’s design for marriage is. Man warped it and turned it into a bunch of different things. Originally it was one man, one woman, for life.

Marriage is symbolic of the union of Christ and His Church. Christ being the husband who gives His life for the church and being the head of the church, the church being the Bride of Christ and co-heirs of eternity with Christ. There is only one church, the church universal, made up of all believers who believe the Gospel message. One savior, one husband, one Universal church, one bride of Christ.


20 posted on 09/02/2007 10:08:10 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson