Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saving 'bullies' Rescuing dogs with aggressive reputations
Richmond Times Dispatch ^ | Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 - 12:07 AM | By JANET CAGGIANO

Posted on 09/02/2007 9:38:31 AM PDT by meandog

Tonya Irizarry was uneducated about pit bulls when she saved Buster from certain death.

The dog's owners had abandoned him at a local shelter a few years ago in the middle of a divorce. Worried over his fate, Irizarry rescued him with the intention of fostering him until a permanent home could be found.

When no one stepped forward, Irizarry, a volunteer with the Henrico Humane Society, decided to keep him. Within a few weeks, she said, she forgot everything she had heard about pit bulls.

"Before I got Buster, I thought the same thing everyone else thinks about pit bulls -- they are aggressive and not good with people. Boy, was I wrong. They are the best dogs ever."

Hoping to spread the word, Irizarry in February co-founded Ring Dog Rescue, a nonprofit organization devoted to finding loving, permanent homes for "bully breed" dogs. "Bullies" are dogs with a reputation of being aggressive, including pit bulls, Rottweilers, bulldogs, boxers and mastiffs.

"There is no one else to stand up for them," said Jennifer Velez, a Chesterfield County resident and a volunteer with Ring Dog. "These dogs are so misrepresented, especially now with the Michael Vick [dogfighting] case."

(Excerpt) Read more at inrich.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: animalrescue; dogs; fear; herewegoagain; loathing; pbts; vick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Another story to show how these dogs have been abused by the press.
1 posted on 09/02/2007 9:38:34 AM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meandog

This story hits the nail on the head. So many breeds have been bred to death. It’s a crime what they have done to this loving breed. They are a wonderful breed; but people have taken that wonderful and turned it nasty.


2 posted on 09/02/2007 9:44:00 AM PDT by freekitty (May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
I wouldn’t adopt a pit bull. Especially one that was known to be abused in it’s former home. That’s just plain stupid.
3 posted on 09/02/2007 9:44:01 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

I would not adopt a pit bull either. There are so many other dogs that need homes that are less risky. The problem with pit bulls, IMO, is not just that they are bred to be vicious. The problem is that IF they bite, their jaws are so strong that they do serious damage. I work with a dog rescue and have known some nice pit bulls, but I would not have one...nor would I like to live next door to one.


4 posted on 09/02/2007 9:55:52 AM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch
Pit rescue groups must have terrible time finding homes. I agree. It’s not the frequency of bites, it’s the relative damage they do when they bite. A Shepherd or Rottweiler will bite your arm or leg, a pit will do both and rip your face off...
5 posted on 09/02/2007 10:00:14 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch
IMHO, it is all in the breeding--some pits are bred to be fighters, and if both parents were bred to be fighters, and so on down the line, they will be vicious dogs.

I once bought a pit bull puppy. He was adorable and our family loved him. He went to obedience training, and I reinforced that training at home. It didn't work. At about 1 year of age, the dog became vicious. He had certainly not been or abused in our home.

My veterernarian had warned me about this when I bought him--but I didn't believe him. Too bad he turned out to be right.

We gave him to a man who promised not to harm him, or put in the the pits to fight. We learned later that that was exactly what he did!

On the other hand, I have known other pits that have made excellent, loving family dogs, and excellent service dogs. That is why I have come to the conclusions that it's all in the breeding.

6 posted on 09/02/2007 10:11:21 AM PDT by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: basil
French and English bulldogs have a sweet disposition and are great to have around kids.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 09/02/2007 10:15:59 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

I don’t know why you would rather be bit by a Rott than a Pitt. They are both going to do such serious damage that it’s a coin flip as far as I’m concerned and Rotts were bred to take down people not animals, unlike pit bulls. Rotts have been tested to have the stronger bite over pit bulls. I think I’d rather take on a Pit than a Rott.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7jhrxy0HKs


8 posted on 09/02/2007 10:37:16 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
The frequency of bites among different breeds is probably similar. The results of the attacks are unmistakable and readily apparent. Like I said a Rottweiler will bite you and hurt you, a pit bull will try to mutilate you in identical circumstances. They have been bred for viciousness. Selective breeding works.
9 posted on 09/02/2007 10:45:30 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

“Studies indicate that pit bull-type dogs were involved in approximately a third of human DBRF (i.e., dog bite related fatalities) reported during the 12-year period from 1981 through 1992, and Rottweilers were responsible for about half of human DBRF reported during the 4 years from 1993 through 1996....[T]he data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities.” (Sacks JJ, Sinclair L, Gilchrist J, Golab GC, Lockwood R. Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998. JAVMA 2000;217:836-840.)


10 posted on 09/02/2007 10:52:32 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Tonya Irizarry was uneducated about pit bulls when she saved Buster from certain death.

And poor old Tonya is still uneducated, the new virginia vicious dog law, the dog so much as farts and she maybe looking at insurance that will bankrupt her in the long run. Three complaints, if she lived next to me I would file the first one tomorrow.

11 posted on 09/02/2007 10:58:12 AM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
From another site:
In comparison, the numbers don't add up. During 1999 the American Kennel Club registered 41,776 Rottweilers compared to 0 Pit Bulls, because Pit Bulls are not a registered breed.

When you look at relative populations (i.e. a more accurate assessment) and couple that with the popularity of the breed as guard dogs where they are supposed to attack, the numbers make sense. Many places have outlawed the breed altogether. You can't expect a direct numerical comparison to be valid when one breed has many times the population of the other one.
12 posted on 09/02/2007 11:04:06 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
Like you’re tagline. I think so too.
13 posted on 09/02/2007 11:05:48 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

My point is that it is arguable which is most dangerous. Rotts are the bigger dog with the stronger bite. Both breeds are terribly dangerous if they become angry. I personally would rather own a Pit or a Rott rather than an Akita, which are the most ill tempered killers of all dogs in my opinion.


14 posted on 09/02/2007 11:10:30 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Like your tagline. I think so too.
_______________________________

Thanks. Hunter just won the Texas straw poll. Only guy I’ve sent any money to this campaign.


15 posted on 09/02/2007 11:11:54 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
It is relative. I just think that Rottweilers being more well known (I’d be interested to read the stats for ‘unknown’ breed attacks), popular as guard dogs where are intended to attack intruders , and the fact that they outnumber pits numerically skews the stats. I’ve been considering rescuing a rot recently, I’d rather have gators next door (I lived in Florida for a few years) than pits. They are less predictable.
16 posted on 09/02/2007 11:19:47 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

The worst thing about pits in my opinion is their inability to deal with temperature extremes. I need a dog that can stay outdoors all day and all night at times. 110 degrees or 10 below, wind rain and snow. Labs and german shepherds have near perfect coat types for this AND their coats are virtually maintenance free. Blue heelers are dam fine dogs too...very smart and very hardy.


17 posted on 09/02/2007 11:21:03 AM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

It’s good news. He’s my pick. I hope he can gain more traction in the area of name recognition. His policies are generally top notch IMO.


18 posted on 09/02/2007 11:21:26 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
Rotts have been tested to have the stronger bite over pit bulls.

Bite FORCE....but I noticed that goofy video didn't do a calculation of the actual bite pressure per square-inch.

The Pit Bull's mouth being smaller, its bite pressure is higher.

19 posted on 09/02/2007 11:36:58 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
. . . if she lived next to me I would file the first one tomorrow . . .

Why?

20 posted on 09/02/2007 11:41:22 AM PDT by Mrs_Stokke (Turn-of-the-century FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson