Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foes of IRS seek friends on campaign trail (Fair Tax backers stand out)
Charlotte Observer ^ | Aug. 31, 2007 | JIM MORRILL

Posted on 09/02/2007 6:42:46 AM PDT by Man50D

When Republican Mike Huckabee met supporters at Knights Stadium last week, more than two dozen showed up wearing the uniform of a group trying to flex its muscle in the presidential primaries.

Dressed in white shirts with "Fair Tax" logos, they're part of a growing movement in South Carolina and around the country pushing for drastic overhaul of the nation's tax laws.

Their group, Americans for Fair Taxation, would abolish the federal income tax and Internal Revenue Service and repeal the 16th Amendment that authorizes them. They would replace it all with a 23 percent national sales tax.

Thousands of Fair Tax supporters rallied in May outside the Republican presidential debate in Columbia. A month later, more than 100 waved signs as would-be candidate Fred Thompson arrived there for a speech.

"We really think that the winner of the South Carolina presidential primary will be a Fair Tax supporter," said John Steinberger, a Charleston teacher and the group's state director.

A handful of wealthy Houston businessmen started the group more than a decade ago. The idea was popularized in a 2005 book co-authored by Neal Boortz, whose syndicated radio show airs on WBT.

Congressional proponents include Charlotte Republican Rep. Sue Myrick. She's among 63 co-sponsors of a House bill that would enact those changes.

Supporters argue that by closing loopholes and taxing what people spend, not what they earn, the sales tax would be more fair. They acknowledge that a sales tax is regressive, falling most heavily on the poor who spend a greater share of income. They say the government would make payments to the poor to help them pay the new tax.

Critics say the change is unrealistic and unworkable, and would create an accounting nightmare that would fall heavily on state governments ill-prepared to handle it.

"

(Excerpt) Read more at charlotte.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairtax; sc2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
They acknowledge that a sales tax is regressive, falling most heavily on the poor who spend a greater share of income.

This is factually incorrect. The Fair Tax is progressive. A person's effective tax rate(post prebate) will decrease as income decreases.

"The required (sales tax) rate would be sufficiently high to make enforcement too difficult and evasion too tempting," writes William Gale, an economist with the Washington-based Tax Policy Center.

The Fair Tax rate is no higher than the total of hidden taxes paid under the income tax. It is actually less if the 7.65 percent employer matching, business taxes and compliance costs are added.

"They're very highly motivated. In terms of their agenda you can't ignore them," he said. "They're going to have an effect."

That effect will be more profound as time passes.

Bruce Bartlett, a Treasury Department official under former President George H.W. Bush, says the effective sales tax would be 30 percent, not the 23 percent that supporters say.

Mr. Bartlett doesn't have a clue. First of all the dollar amount collected will be the same regardless if quoting the 23% inclusive rate or the 30% exclusive rate. Second, those quotes are before the prebate. The effective rate is post prebate. On average the effective rate will be 15.5%.
1 posted on 09/02/2007 6:42:49 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer; Taxman; pigdog; Principled; EternalVigilance; PhilWill; kevkrom; n-tres-ted; ...

Fair Tax ping!


2 posted on 09/02/2007 6:43:17 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The Fair Tax Fraud:

http://www.mises.org/story/1814

The Consumption Tax: A Critique:

http://www.mises.org/story/1768

3 posted on 09/02/2007 6:53:39 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
The current tax system is an abomination and needs to be replaced — and the Fair Tax is the best alternative ever developed.

That said, it’s far too complex an issue to serve as a major platform in a Presidential campaign. Any candidate that tries to use it as a platform will be faced with myriad mindless and misleading bumper sticker slogans, each of which could easily be put to bed in one-on-one conversations with thinking people, but which will be impossible to deal with in large numbers on a national level. And, however impossible the problem is on its own merits, the leftist press, invested in maintaining the current system and the liberal ideology that depends on it, will be dedicated to publishing as much misinformation regarding this subject as possible.

I don’t like Huckabee — he’s a natural tyrant — and I wouldn’t mind seeing him step on his own privates in this regard, but I still hope that he doesn’t adopt the Fair Tax because it needs and deserves — and the American public needs and deserves — a fair hearing in a proper venue.

4 posted on 09/02/2007 7:16:07 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; ancient_geezer; Taxman; pigdog; Principled; EternalVigilance; PhilWill; kevkrom; ...

I am in favor of the fair tax, however, I wonder what Neal Boortz is going to think of Mr Huckabee proposal to introduce a federal law banning public smoking.


5 posted on 09/02/2007 7:19:19 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I am in favor of the fair tax, however, I wonder what Neal Boortz is going to think of Mr Huckabee proposal to introduce a federal law banning public smoking.
Would that be before or after his proposal to increase taxes?
6 posted on 09/02/2007 7:33:46 AM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
"... the Fair Tax is the best alternative ever developed."

#7 in the list of "Lies you must believe to support the fairtax"

7 posted on 09/02/2007 7:37:03 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

At least the posts here make sense. Perviously I was hustled in what I can only call a “jsck booted’ respnse vby supporters. It was like posting to a FRED Thread. That type of behavior by supporters will only cause big losses for their cause.

BTW I and my wife are retired. We are in the 29% tax bracket PLUS 7.25% State and Local Sales TAx. People think they pay that amount or more based on the Fedral Tax rates. They forget that it is a GRADUATED Income Tax and the upper ranges are a marginal rate of tax, not on the entire (taxable) income. SIC. Mr BOORTZ and his pals will gheta reduction of tax under fair tax, while the rest of the country will be calling it a F* Tax.

Does he think people will be buying a $21000+ economical car and paying close to $30,000 under a “F” Tax? Will the factory workers, sales people, transporters etc be thrown out of work? - the same for many other parts of the economy. So will we need more “F”: Tax to make up the pitfall?


8 posted on 09/02/2007 7:47:26 AM PDT by Mumbles (Because we disagree doesn't make you or me right. Treat each other with respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"The effective rate is post prebate. On average the effective rate will be 15.5%."

If it is true that the Fair Tax merely replaces the hidden taxes and other tax costs, then the price we pay for goods and services will remain the same. Why is the prebate necessary? I mean, if the poor have the same amount of untaxed disposable income (or government handouts) and if prices remain the same with the Fair Tax added, why the 500 bucks every month?

The poor are paying these hidden taxes today and nobody's crying for them today saying that these hidden taxes are "falling most heavily on the poor who spend a greater share of income". Why the sudden socialistic compassion for "the poor"? To get their vote?

Eliminate the prebate and tout the Fair Tax at 15%. Wouldn't that be more platable to the American people?

9 posted on 09/02/2007 7:51:53 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

If “Fair Tax” supporters could put on a push like all America did for the “Immigration” sell out the Fair Tax would be enacted by years end.


10 posted on 09/02/2007 8:03:01 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetsvette
"That said, it’s far too complex an issue to serve as a major platform in a Presidential campaign."

Even Forbes' "flat tax on a postcard" didn't fly, and you can't get simpler than that.

The Fair Tax? Forget it. Not when you still have posters on this forum and articles still being written that say, "Imagine paying the same price for something but having your entire paycheck to buy it." And you get a "prebate" check every month from the federal government for $500! Plus, if you order now ...

Oh, and I have yet to find an income bracket that doesn't save money using the Fair Tax calculator. Yet it's revenue neutral.

Can you explain to me why, if prices and take home pay remain the same under the Fair Tax, the prebate is necessary? You can't. And that's a very simple question.

11 posted on 09/02/2007 8:12:32 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

It’s like Rep. John Linder said, “ pay 35%+ when you earn it or 22% when you spend it “ . I’d much rather pay the 22% on purchases, as would most people .

Isn’t there also a prebate on neccessities for everyone ?


12 posted on 09/02/2007 8:37:40 AM PDT by Neu Pragmatist ( Who's " Bot " are you ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Why is the prebate necessary? I mean, if the poor have the same amount of untaxed disposable income (or government handouts) and if prices remain the same with the Fair Tax added, why the 500 bucks every month?

You are neglecting a very essential point. The prebate is not a handout. It is not intended to pay bills (i.e. rent, food, shelter, clothing). No family could subsist on only the prebate. It is a refund only of taxes paid on those necessities up to the poverty level. It is somewhat similar to a tax refund under the income tax.

The poor are paying these hidden taxes today and nobody's crying for them today saying that these hidden taxes are "falling most heavily on the poor who spend a greater share of income".

Too few people are saying it today for anybody, regardless of economic class, because most people don't realize they exist! As the old adage goes, out of sight out of mind.
13 posted on 09/02/2007 8:39:43 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

The prebate is necessary so nobody, not even Bill Gates, has to pay taxes on the basics of life. Call it a tax free cost zone. In some states no sales taxes are paid on medicine and food. Can you guess why?


14 posted on 09/02/2007 8:42:39 AM PDT by groanup (Limited government is the answer. What's the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mumbles
"Does he think people will be buying a $21000+ economical car and paying close to $30,000 under a “F” Tax?"

If the car is an import, you'll add a $6300 Fair Tax to the $21,000 sticker price. To make matters worse, your bank will only finance what the car is worth -- $21,000 (less some down payment).

Meaning you've got to come up with, say, a 10% down payment ($2100) plus the Fair Tax ($6300), cash. Got $8400 in the bank laying around collecting dust?

Hey, it could be worse -- you could be buying a new home!

Now, in all fairness, you could buy a used car and avoid the Fair Tax. But, since that thought is occurring simultaneously to all car buyers nationwide, expect the price of used cars to skyrocket. Supply and demand, doncha know.

Or, you can buy a domestic car. According to some Fair Taxers, domestic car manufacturers will reduce the price of their cars by 23% when they remove the hidden taxes, then add the 23% Fair Tax, resulting in that $21,000 car costing the same. You'll still need a down payment and you'll still need to come up with $6300.

That is assuming the car manufacturers will pass on this 23% price reduction to the consumer and not keep some or all of it as profit or give it to the shareholders as dividends. Keep in mind that their foreign competitor is raising their price by 30%. If your competitor did that to you, would your keep your price 30% below his?

15 posted on 09/02/2007 8:43:50 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Even Forbes' "flat tax on a postcard" didn't fly, and you can't get simpler than that.

It will get simpler with The Fair Tax because there will be no tax forms to fill out! Fair Tax on a receipt. That's as simple as it can be.

The Fair Tax? Forget it.

Tell that to the growing number of Fair Tax volunteers.

Can you explain to me why, if prices and take home pay remain the same under the Fair Tax, the prebate is necessary? You can't. And that's a very simple question.

The simple is answer can be found in post #13.
16 posted on 09/02/2007 8:46:56 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist
Isn’t there also a prebate on neccessities for everyone ?

All valid Social Security cardholders who are U.S. residents receive a monthly rebate equivalent to the FairTax paid on essential goods and services, also known as the poverty level expenditures. Fair Tax FAQ #3 but keep in mind the prebate for the wealthiest people will be such a small percentage compared to their income that their effective tax rate(after the prebate) will still be close to the maximum 23% .
17 posted on 09/02/2007 8:54:34 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist
“pay 35%+ when you earn it or 22% when you spend it“

I can't argue the fact that, taken at face value, this looks real good for those in the 35% bracket. Those in the 15% bracket, on the other hand, ...

"Isn’t there also a prebate on neccessities for everyone?"

Bill Gates might argue that.

The prebate is equal to the Fair Tax rate times the poverty income level. Since those who are at or below the poverty rate spend most of their money on necessities, the prebate is being touted as a way for the poor not to pay taxes. Though everyone gets it.

Now, prices today contain hidden taxes that the Fair Tax replaces. The poor are paying these hidden taxes today and not getting rebated or prebated today. Why the sudden compassion?

18 posted on 09/02/2007 8:58:19 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
#7 in the list of “Lies you must believe to support the fairtax”

Okay, I’ll bite — what other alternative that’s been presented is better?

19 posted on 09/02/2007 9:10:57 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
“pay 35%+ when you earn it or 22% when you spend it“
I can't argue the fact that, taken at face value, this looks real good for those in the 35% bracket. Those in the 15% bracket, on the other hand, ...
The only problem is Rep. Linder, Boortz, and these FairTaxers claim you currently pay 35% when you earn it and 22% when you spend it.

It's a lie.
20 posted on 09/02/2007 9:14:16 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson