Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dbacks
I’ve told you a thousand times, don’t exagerate.

==

What are we missing?


Reading ability for one thing.

Recheck my original post. The [it goes from deep into Mexico to Canada and is a half mile wide here in the US.] is a quote from someone else's post.

I do recall, however, that some of the rights-of-way for the SH have been stated in other articles to be that wide of an area. In some areas, where the ports are going to be, would require a wide right-of-way.

I did notice that your response provided no links to justify you condemnation of the original statement. The onus is on you to provide a link that disproves the 1/2-mile wide statement.
153 posted on 09/02/2007 7:07:37 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy

[The onus is on you to provide a link that disproves the 1/2-mile wide statement.]

I don’t feel a need to disprove it, rather I would like to have someone justify the need or rationale. Does 100+ lanes make any sense at all? To anyone??

Just questioning, not saying anyone is lying or mistating.


404 posted on 09/02/2007 5:09:14 PM PDT by dbacks (I forgot to pay the rent on my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson