Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duncan Hunter Wins Townhall.com Texas Republican Straw Poll; Fred Thompson Second (Sorry Paulites)
Townhall ^ | August 31, 2007 | townhall

Posted on 09/01/2007 1:41:38 PM PDT by Tears of a Clown

41.1% Duncan Hunter (534 votes) 20.5% Fred Thompson (266 votes) 16.17% Ron Paul (217 votes) 6.4% Mike Huckabee (83 votes) 6% Rudy Giuliani (78 votes) 4.7% Mitt Romney (61 votes) 2.2% Ray McKinney (28 votes) .77% John Cox (10 votes) .62% John McCain (8 votes) .46% Sam Brownback (6 votes) .46% Tom Tancredo (6 votes) .23% Hugh Cort (3 votes)


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2008; b4dh; duncan; duncanhunter; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; hunter; notbreakingnews; paulbeatsgiuliani; president; spartansixdelta; strawpolls; townhall; tx2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-213 next last
To: hocndoc

That is a disgusting group of unpatriotic scum.
I’m sorry you even had to see it up close.


141 posted on 09/01/2007 6:24:23 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Tears of a Clown
Ron Paul would get more democrat votes in that scenario, I think.

Wrong. Ron Paul is not anti-war in the same vein as the Democrats. He supports a traditional non-interventionist foreign policy, no nation-building, and no foreign aid boondoggles. He wouldn't send troops to Darfur, for example, as a Democrat President would. Anti-war moonbats won't support him because their real agenda is pushing the U.S. towards global socialism and sending troops to their cause de jour

Also he is completely conservative on all the other issues. He would pull in a lot of Reagan Democrats, libertarian, and swing voters simply because he is better on domestic issues and government than all of the candidates combined.

So yes, even though he admitted he wouldn't run as a 3rd party candidate his candidacy should still give the GOP establishment the heebie-jeebies.

142 posted on 09/01/2007 6:25:33 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold
I don’t know about VP but, but Tancredo would make a damned good head of The Department of Homleland Security. That job begs for someone like him.

Amen. And Jeff Sessions ought to be a supreme court judge. The man is so thoughtful and loves the truth.

143 posted on 09/01/2007 6:32:11 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
And Jeff Sessions ought to be a supreme court judge. The man is so thoughtful and loves the truth.

Wouldn't that be something.

Ginsberg, Souter and I believe Kennedy would probably go postal surrounded by conservatives. lol

144 posted on 09/01/2007 6:39:58 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger
Congratulations to Congressman Hunter and all his supporters! This victory should give his campaign new momentum.

NEW momentum? When was there ever any momentum at all?

145 posted on 09/01/2007 6:43:03 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Tears of a Clown

BTTT...


146 posted on 09/01/2007 6:50:15 PM PDT by LowOiL (Duncan Hunter .. a man your not ashamed to support full heartedly..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmyrlefuller

Mr. McKinney and Mr. Cox impressed a lot of us with their good conservative values. Dr. Cort said he’d overturn Roe with an Executive Order if he were elected, and that blew any interest we might have had,since we don’t believe that would be possible and we aren’t fans of the whole “stroke of the pen, law of the land” deal.

There were all good men there and I would love to see some combination of the top two candidates.

(Although I believe we have men who earned their place and that any of them are better than anything the other side have to offer, I’m still hopefully waiting for the rise of candidates that aren’t older white men. We are the revolutionary party and our up and coming candidates are all qualified by much more than some “minority” status. And I’ll be glad when the day comes when those men and women are the front runners for President. Better yet will be the day when even people like me can/will only compare values and credentials because there’s nothing out of the ordinary for women and minorities on the top of the ballot. First, the credentials and experience, though, always.)


147 posted on 09/01/2007 6:56:38 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

BTTT ...and with grammer repair for the tagline...


148 posted on 09/01/2007 6:57:33 PM PDT by LowOiL (Duncan Hunter .. a man you're not ashamed to support full heartedly..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Hoping and praying for Hunter myself.


149 posted on 09/01/2007 6:59:37 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: billbears
"I'd say he did quite well considering . . "

Still, the cost was high. Trees died, my view was blocked, and a lot of good conservative Republicans were very irritated.

To have all those little angry men (easily 9/10 were male), who had never joined to advocate conservative causes, who had never FReeped a dem or abortion clinic in their lives, come out and boo our Vice President, to refuse to applaud our troops, is unforgivable. An dumb. Wrong crowd.

150 posted on 09/01/2007 7:03:30 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Thank you. I pray for him as well. Can never hurt. ;)


151 posted on 09/01/2007 7:08:38 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

It’s obvious that you and I have come to our senses. Let’s hope the rest of the Republicans will wake up too.


152 posted on 09/01/2007 7:11:02 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I’ve watched Dr. Paul for years, refusing to vote against limits on abortion. He can’t see that the reality is that we have to make incremental changes, place limits on what the Supreme Court declared a “right.”

He’s talking about a world without airplanes.

Paul wouldn’t have joined in D-Day since the Germans never attacked the US and I’d bet he would have joined the “troothers” for Pearl Harbor. ??Possibly blaming the US for the war on China?

He’d condemn the Berlin Airlift in ‘48 and certainly will never be Ronald Reagan, saying “Tear down this wall.

He’s ignoring the North Korean missiles that could be aimed at Alaska (not to mention Japan) and the possible sale of nuclear weapons to Iran.

He’s not commander material.


153 posted on 09/01/2007 7:12:18 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc
To have all those little angry men (easily 9/10 were male), who had never joined to advocate conservative causes, who had never FReeped a dem or abortion clinic in their lives, come out and boo our Vice President, to refuse to applaud our troops, is unforgivable. An dumb

Put some ice on it. Rep. Paul is doing something we haven't seen since Reagan. Putting together a group from all sides of the aisle. Not playing to an ever shrinking base whose sole issue is bombing 3rd world nations, Dr. Paul is reaching out to everyone who believes in liberty and freedom. I realize these views are foreign to party faithful (along with the view of limited government) but a lot of us conservatives still believe in them

154 posted on 09/01/2007 7:12:24 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Tafts Ghost

The men I saw were older. Most were men - in shaggy beards, orange, pink and green shirts.

I was worried about the numbers who didn’t applaud when we talked about marriage as one man and one woman. Some even missed the cue when Dr. Paul made prolife statements.

The biggest worry were the people outside trying to talk passers by into voting for Paul in the primary when they knew the person they were talking to were not Republican.

Of course, neither is Ron Paul.


155 posted on 09/01/2007 7:17:13 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

From your keyboard to the rest of the entire Republican party.


156 posted on 09/01/2007 7:18:09 PM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Tears of a Clown

Congrats to Mr. Hunter and his supporters.


157 posted on 09/01/2007 7:20:11 PM PDT by Col Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
"Put some ice on it."

You do realize who made that line famous and when, in what context? Or is it that you didn't come to FR until after the 2000 election, so you missed a bit of history?? Trust me, a FReeper should never say those words to a fellow FReeper. A male FReeper is an idiot or hateful beyond belief if he says it to a female FReeper.

158 posted on 09/01/2007 7:25:35 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

It is a phrase that has been around for decades AFAIK that means very simply to get over it. But as I see you can’t, or won’t, address the issue that party Republicans have less concern for liberty, freedom, and limited government, you take one phrase and change the subject.


159 posted on 09/01/2007 8:18:52 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: billbears

That’s the problem - hanging around with conservatives, but you don’t know what we’re about.

One of which is not reacting well to people who don’t applaud our soldiers, who boo our Vice President in public, and who say they’d take our troops out of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, *and* Israel so Bin Ladin won’t get mad. Not to mention not being able to tell us how far they’d back off for Saddam, Kim Chong Il, and every other little tyrant.


160 posted on 09/01/2007 8:39:07 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-213 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson