Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards' wife talks of Clinton 'hatred'
Yahoo ^

Posted on 08/31/2007 9:53:24 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Edwards' wife talks of Clinton 'hatred'

By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer 4 minutes ago

Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, says "hatred" of his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton would motivate Republicans to vote against her in the general election.

"I want to be perfectly clear: I do not think the hatred against Hillary Clinton is justified," Elizabeth Edwards said in an interview with Time magazine out this week. "I don't know where it comes from. I don't begin to understand it. But you can't pretend it doesn't exist, and it will energize the Republican base. Their nominee won't energize them, Bush won't, but Hillary as the nominee will. It's hard for John to talk about, but it's the reality."

Responding to Mrs. Edwards, Clinton spokesman Phil Singer said polls show that Clinton will be a strong opponent against the Republicans seeking the presidency.

"Senator Clinton leads all the leading Republicans in national and key swing state polls because Americans know she is the Democrat with the strength and experience to bring real change," Singer said.

Elizabeth Edwards has become the voice for many criticisms of her husband's leading rivals. She has suggested that Obama and his campaign plagiarized material from Edwards' 2004 presidential campaign and criticized Obama for opposing the Iraq war but voting for the funding, saying that he's been "behaving in a holier-than-thou way."

But many of her criticisms have been aimed at Clinton. She's criticized her for not having the "political will" to enact universal health care. She also said her husband has a better record on women's issues than Clinton.

Last year, Mrs. Edwards apologized to Clinton after saying her choices in life have made her happier than the New York senator.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; democrats; edwards; hillary; negatives; shewearsthepants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
go figure.........
1 posted on 08/31/2007 9:53:25 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

You know the playground rules: Only girls can hit girls.


2 posted on 08/31/2007 9:56:51 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Not hatred, just a wondering how long the Clintons can get by their bs like this latest flap in the Clintoon closet.


3 posted on 08/31/2007 9:57:27 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
How about “loath” or “puke at the mere mention of their name”, or “gag” at a picture of Hildabeast and that SH*t eating smile she flashes? Meadow Muffin
4 posted on 08/31/2007 9:58:05 AM PDT by rwgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I do not think the hatred against Hillary Clinton is justified," Elizabeth Edwards said in an interview with Time magazine out this week. "I don't know where it comes from. I don't begin to understand it.
Apparently Mrs. Edwards has a worse memory than Hillary Clinton herself.

5 posted on 08/31/2007 10:00:26 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Elizabeth Edwards this...

Elizabeth Edwards that...

Holy Moley. Doesn’t her husband say or do anything in HIS campaign?

Or is it his job to sit there, look pretty, and say stupid stuff, like Americans should give up their SUV’s?


6 posted on 08/31/2007 10:01:12 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

>> “I want to be perfectly clear: I do not think the hatred against Hillary Clinton is justified,” Elizabeth Edwards said

Whaddayaknow... here’s yet another point on which Elizabeth Edwards and I disagree.


7 posted on 08/31/2007 10:02:32 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Elizabeth Edwards...says "hatred" of his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton would motivate Republicans to vote against her...

Oh please let us run against Edwards...

8 posted on 08/31/2007 10:03:21 AM PDT by Snardius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
But you can't pretend it doesn't exist, and it will energize the Republican base. Their nominee won't energize them, Bush won't, but Hillary as the nominee will. It's hard for John to talk about, but it's the reality."

Let me get this straight.... vote for my husband because the republicans will be so bored by the whole thing that they will stay home?

9 posted on 08/31/2007 10:05:51 AM PDT by DejaJude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

10 posted on 08/31/2007 10:07:49 AM PDT by GalaxieFiveHundred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Their nominee won't energize them she said.

Unlike Edwards, whose campaign is so lifeless it requires "energy" from his wife. LOL.

11 posted on 08/31/2007 10:08:21 AM PDT by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

FYI


12 posted on 08/31/2007 10:08:57 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
A sweet political move. Get the wife, terminally ill, to make the obvious point.

Sympathy will mute the negative response, and the truth of the statement will stick.

13 posted on 08/31/2007 10:10:48 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Everybody knows about the Hildabeast. Rapidly getting tired of Liz Edwards as well. The ‘but she has Ca’ free pass has burnt out. Nobody gave me a ride all day wrist band when I was underneath a Linear Accelerator.


14 posted on 08/31/2007 10:11:02 AM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

If only we can get Elizabeth to pound Hillary on her Illegal campaign contributions from criminals and foreigners from Japan.

It would be hard for media to ignore it then... Perhaps sending Hillary illegal campaign contribution information to media is the wrong approach, send the info to her rivals!
We know RATS have no problem eating their own...


15 posted on 08/31/2007 10:13:28 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
says "hatred" of his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton would motivate Republicans to vote against her in the general election.

General election? I'm thinking about changing parties just so I can vote against her in the primary. I don't agree with Edwards or Obama or the rest, but I don't fear for my country's continued existance under them. I do under Hillary. The chance that Hillary would be so disgusting to the American people that they would be more likely to vote Republican in 2008 just isn't worth the risk. She must be stopped at the earliest possible time.

16 posted on 08/31/2007 10:15:04 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Or is it his job to sit there, look pretty, and say stupid stuff, like Americans should give up their SUV’s?”
_______________________________________________________________

Well, in recent weeks, every time Silky Pony opens his mouth, it’s to put his foot in it.


17 posted on 08/31/2007 10:16:20 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Does she think or believe that her wimpy husband would be less polarizing than Hillary? This is what is known as an argument from ignorance. The only reason that Edwards isn’t motivating Republicans to attack him as they do Hillary is because no one in their right mind thinks that he will be the Democratic nominee.
18 posted on 08/31/2007 10:16:45 AM PDT by Ferox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All; Grampa Dave

.

NEVER FORGET

.

HILLARY RODHAM & WILLIAM CLINTON’s support of our terrorist enemy Communist North Vietnam Dictator HO CHI MINH’s push to take over a then Free South Vietnam during the Vietnam War =

Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education (SLAVE LABOR) Camp

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1806248/posts

.

What price is left for the still Free (that’s US) to pay now, with our own Freedom directly at stake right here at home..?

.

NEVER FORGET

.


19 posted on 08/31/2007 10:17:43 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Does Elizabeth really think nobody will notice she’s being disingenuous? She’s a viper.


20 posted on 08/31/2007 10:20:27 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson