Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney: Keep feds out of health care (Mitt says NO to "Hillary Care")
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/31/07 | Jim Davenport - ap

Posted on 08/31/2007 8:20:43 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

AIKEN, S.C. - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney focused Friday on stopping illegal immigration and keeping Washington out of increased health care coverage.

During a morning campaign stop in Aiken, Romney said he doesn't want the federal government to take over providing health care for the nation's uninsured.

"Don't have 'Hillary Care,'" Romney said, referring to his favorite Democrat target, New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. The former Massachusetts governor said he doesn't want to "have the guys who ran the Katrina cleanup" in charge of health care. He said he'd leave it up to states to design their own systems.

Romney had several stops planned in this early voting state Friday, and some were to take him through counties with some of South Carolina's largest immigrant populations.

Romney said he'd help stop illegal immigrants by sanctioning employers that give them paychecks, and oppose so-called sanctuary cities that give illegal immigrants housing and other benefits.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; feds; healthcare; hillarycare; mittromney; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2007 8:20:46 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Funny, he has no problem mandating insurance and covering the costs for those who can’t afford it.


2 posted on 08/31/2007 8:22:56 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The “drumbeat” for health care being an issue in this election continues. It will be hard for any candidate to stand up and say my plan is to have no plan.


3 posted on 08/31/2007 8:29:24 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Well, I don’t like what he did here in Massachusetts on health care.

But I do like that he doesn’t see a role for the federal government in it. And as president, that would be his focus.


4 posted on 08/31/2007 8:29:52 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Feds have their claws so deep into health care I really do not see them releasing the grip.

Doctors came up with the idea of same day surgery in an effort to control costs. Now the Feds say since it is cheaper than hospital care we will only pay $.60 on the dollar.

5 posted on 08/31/2007 8:32:01 AM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

And he wants to spend more federal money on cancer research.


6 posted on 08/31/2007 8:33:30 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“He said he’d leave it up to states to design their own systems. “

I think he’ll mandate that the states have comprehensive health care systems, give a deadline, provide block grants for the development and deployment, and threaten to pull highway funds of they don’t. He won’t tell them what type of comprehensive system to have other than that it covers everyone in the state. That would fit the letter of what his words now are, and would be consistent with the system he installed in his state.

Any state could have any system they want, which is the status quo now. Mitt is hinting around that he’ll change the status quo, using his power as president. We’ll have 50 state health programs run by and paid for by the states, rather than one federal system.

Mitt realizes we are a republic, not a democracy.


7 posted on 08/31/2007 8:36:57 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

His support of the ‘assault weapons ban’ is enough for me to give him no attention.


8 posted on 08/31/2007 8:37:20 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant
While not perfect, it's better than the taxpayers paying for the freeloaders. It's preferable that more of those receiving the care, be the ones who pay for it. Saves us money in the end.

"Massachusetts in 2002 was spending an enormous amount of public money on health care--and yet leaving almost one 10th of its population uncovered. Romney became more and more interested in this problem and demanded a detailed survey of the uninsured population."

"The big surprise revealed by Romney's investigation: The uninsured were not as poor as everybody had assumed they were. A majority of them could have bought health insurance if they wanted to--they chose not to buy, because they regarded health insurance as a bad deal. It cost too much...It covered too much. And everybody knew that even if you did not buy it, hospitals would care for you all the same." (Could This Man Be the Next U.S. President?, David Frum, January 10, 2007)

Under federal law, nearly all hospitals are required to provide a certain level of treatment to all patients who visit their emergency rooms, regardless of those patients’ ability to pay. Governor Romney sought a way to prevent the free-rider problem: those who take advantage of emergency services and then skip out on the charges, leaving taxpayers to cover the bill. In a very real sense, we already have “universal healthcare” in the U.S., but many are not paying their share of the cost for the services they receive.

9 posted on 08/31/2007 8:38:30 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I have no idea what Romney would do. take any issue and you can find he has supported both sides.


10 posted on 08/31/2007 8:38:59 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

So you did not vote for Reagan (Brady Bill) or Bush (AWB) either?


11 posted on 08/31/2007 8:39:23 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

12 posted on 08/31/2007 8:42:37 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

No it’s not preferable. It is a huge step to socialized medicine. A better plan would be to deregulate the federal and state mandates and let insurance companies compete. In my state, they mandated that ALL health care plans offered must cover sh*t like abortions, birth control, mental health, etc, etc. 70% of insurers left the state and the prices syrocketed. THAT explains why so many do not have coverage.


13 posted on 08/31/2007 8:42:57 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant

These people refuse to understand that the driving force behind soaring costs for healthcare is GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT.


14 posted on 08/31/2007 8:44:12 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Brady bill, though I did not approve of it, is a far cry from the AWB. Bush let the AWB expire without a word of protest (he actually has a stellar record on the 2A). GWB was not responsible for the AWB becoming law, either and to the best of my knowledge did not pursue one in Texas.


15 posted on 08/31/2007 8:46:11 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I like Hunter’s idea of trying to get states to deregulate so a citizen can get insurance from any provider in the country.


16 posted on 08/31/2007 8:47:47 AM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I can’t wait for Romney to debate Hillary on health care!!!


17 posted on 08/31/2007 8:47:58 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
A better plan would be to deregulate the federal and state mandates and let insurance companies compete.

That is precisely Step #1 in Romney's plan. You haven't read the actual plan, have you?

Romney understands that we cannot allow the dems to own this issue as it is a huge concern for middle America. His proposed plan is substantially better than the one enacted in Masschusetts. The liberal legislature overrode eight of his vetoes altering his original plan. Here's a more viewable version of his current plan in a power point format:

The Romney Vision: Health Care Reform Goals

• First, Instituting Reforms That Make Private Health Insurance Affordable. More Americans need access to quality, private health insurance.

• Second, Providing Access To Quality Health Insurance For Every American.

• Third, Enhancing The Portability Of Private Health Insurance.

• Finally, Slowing The Rate Of Inflation In Health Care Spending.

Linking Goals With Action Steps:
The Federalist Approach -- Governor Romney's Approach To Health Care Reform Is One That Values The States As Laboratories Of Innovation And Beacons Of Creativity.

The Romney Plan: Six Action Steps

----->• Step 1: Establish Federal Incentives To Deregulate And Reform State Health Insurance Markets So Market Forces Can Work.

• Step 2: Redirect Federal Spending On "Free Care" To Help The Low-Income Uninsured Purchase Private Insurance.

• Step 3: Institute Health Savings Account (HSA) Enhancements And The Full Deductibility Of Qualified Medical Expenses.

• Step 4: Promote Innovation In Medicaid.

• Step 5: Implement Medical Liability Reform.

• Step 6: Bring Market Dynamics And Modern Technology To Health Care.

18 posted on 08/31/2007 8:49:21 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Thank you for posting this but as usual it will be hijacked since it deals positively with Romney.

As far as I can tell, Romney is the only GOP candidate with a real plan and with a real record on the issue. The others are blowing hot air.


19 posted on 08/31/2007 8:49:57 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

I can’t wait for Romney to debate Hillary on health care!!!

-

lol,, soon we may, ya never know.. Too bad they don’t have a debate by opponents before the primary, it would give a better sense of the candidates and their strengths and failings and how they flirt with folly..

It would be nice to just cut to the chase and get this perpetual political season over with..

Looks like another cooker out your way, you get thunderbumpers last night? .. I saw FResno had some electrical activity, lightning and such, flash flood warnings in effect today too in the Inland valleys again..


20 posted on 08/31/2007 8:52:12 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson