[tractorman]

If homosexuality were normal, none of us would be here.

[poobear]

WTF?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wouldn’t showing a heterosexual family’s sex life be termed PORNOGRAGHY?

SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Manic_Episode]

Our society is so screwed.

[yldstrk]

Gads.............

[T.Smith]

"It's very likely that we in the civil rights community will take legal action to have the committee's recommendation to show this film enforced. We believe the board's actions are illegal."

Keep your sickness away from my kids you SOB!

[RedRightReturn]

My sister teaches elementary ed in this school district. She says this controversy was a huge mess. Although she didn’t show the video, her colleagues that were required to show this filth were sick about it. Yes, even the teachers didn’t want this in the school!

[PrincessB]

Would it be possible to teach children to maybe read, do math, spell?

[gathersnomoss]

I guess they removed the Daddy Does Daddy title.

[DJ MacWoW]

"It's very likely that we in the civil rights community will take legal action to have the committee's recommendation to show this film enforced. We believe the board's actions are illegal."

It's not a civil right to teach my child morality..........or lack of it. These deviants are trying to usurp parents rights through the schools and courts.

[Sicon]

In a survey of the issue, district parents were split nearly half and half on the issue, she said

Somehow, I suspect this means that more people were opposed to the film being shown than were in favor. Had more than 50% been in favor, they would have said "a majority of district parents were in favor of showing the film..."

[Neoliberalnot]

It is all about homo access to kids. They want your kids and they will have them with the help of the ACLU, corrupt judges, and progressive liberals.

[Greg F]

Get involved in local school politics. This is obscene. . . .recommended keeping the video in the curriculum, but showing it to fourth graders, instead of to third graders, as had been done.

[Grig]

The objective is to create acceptance of alternate ‘families’ before they have any idea what sex is, then when they clue into the concept of sex they can just transfer acceptance of the alternate ‘family’ to acceptance of gay sex.

[Alouette]

Homosexual partners can not make children on their own. The only way they can “have a family” is to claim other people’s children.

[BallyBill]

The same people that feel this video is OK for kids, would get “the vapors” if the school showed an NRA sponsored gun safety video.

[metmom]

ANOTHER REASON TO HOMESCHOOL

This ping list is for the “other” articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. If you want on/off this list, please freepmail me. The main Homeschool Ping List by DaveLoneRanger handles the homeschool-specific articles.

[khnyny]

Another reason everyone should get their children out of public schools - now.

[Hat-Trick]

A more basic question is this - why do schools believe it is their responsibility to teach anything about families at all? They’ve already got their hands full trying to teach the 3 R’s. Many teach history as some type of revisionist social studies, as opposed to just teaching history. IMO, public schools should stay away from teaching anything about families and family structure. That teaching should come from the family or the church.

[metmom]

Jeanne Smith, a spokeswoman for the board, said: "The opinions expressed by members of the board against the video dealt with their worry that the video had become so divisive that it would continue to inflame the district and that there would be no healing."

Can't not show it because it's wrong, now could we?

Reacting to last night's vote, Steven Goldstein, chairman of the gay civil rights group Garden State Equality, said: "It's very likely that we in the civil rights community will take legal action to have the committee's recommendation to show this film enforced. We believe the board's actions are illegal."

We in the civil rights community? What a not so subtle slam against everyone who disagrees with them. The clear implication is that *breeders* do not believe in civil rights but oppression.

They may believe that the actions are illegal, but too bad, it doesn't mean they are. They may not like it but that doesn't mean they're illegal.

So now they're threatening the school district with a lawsuit to force them to capitulate because they cannot afford the financial hit defending themselves would cost.

[GlennBeck08]

Wow. Sometimes words don’t do an article any justice and this is one of those times.