Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Has Betrayed The GOP! (Former Staff Member on Ron Paul's change after 9/11)
AFK at Townhall ^ | 04/18/2007 | Cary Wesberry

Posted on 08/31/2007 5:28:19 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Is this what my grand party has come to?  Ron Paul is insulting, incompetent, and now I am sure he is an outright nut.  What I am posting here stupefied me after I read it.  I could not believe I was reading about a Republican... in Congress for 20 YEARS NO LESS!  I've posted the statement from Eric Dondero in its entirety; emphasis mine.  I suggest you take the time to read the whole thing.  It is a sad and pathetic story.  Read my previous post on this so-called Republican and after you do that, read this:



________________________________________
My name is Eric Dondero Rittberg.  For 12 years I worked on and off, mostly on, for Ron Paul.  I started on his staff in 1987 during his Libertarian Party Presidential campaign.  I served throughout 87 and 88 as his Personal Travel Aide.  Ron and I campaigned in over 40 states, including Alaska. 
 
In 1992, I organized Ron's Presidential Exploratory Committee.  We operated the effort for about 4 months.  We aborted the effort when Pat Buchanan declared for the GOP primaries.
 
In 1995, Ron agreed to serve as my "boss" as National Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus. 
 
In 1996, Ron decided to test the waters for a Congressional Campaign.  I moved to Texas and served as his Campaign Coordinator.  Ron won first in the Primary and then in the General with 51%.
 
In 1997, Ron hired me as his Senior Aide and District Representative.  My job title was to represent the Congressman at all functions throughout the District, to speak in his absence, and to handle all District Scheduling.  I was also in charge of Local Governmental relations. 
 
I served in that capacity til February of 2004. 
 
I can honestly say that the Congressman was more than just my boss, he was also my friend.  We had a good understanding, after years of working together, and were very good Travel mates.  Him and I would literally spend hours in the car traveling from one event to another, during campaigning and for District events.  We would debate everything under the sun, in a friendly and fun sort of way.  Our differences were always over abortion - I am Pro-Choice, he is firmly Pro-Life, and over foreign policy - I am Pro-Defense, he has always been more Non-interventionist.  But we always maintained our friendship. 
 
Then September 11, 2001 hit.  My boss, Ron Paul, all of a sudden changed dramatically.  Whereas before he was a reasonable non-interventionist, he was now rabidly so. 
 
I must say that Ron always knew how to play the game before 2001.  He always campaigned as a die-in-the-wool rock-ribbed Conservative Republican.  Coming from the Libertarian Party there was always suspicions about him on this.  So, he went the extra mile within the District to allay such concerns.
 
He also campaigned as a "Bush Republican."  I recall two specific events when Ron publicly backed Bush for President, quite enthusiastically; Once during a big GOP dinner in Wharton, and another time during a Bush for President fundraising in Corpus Christi.  He also had Bush's photo on the wall at our District Office in Freeport. 
 
I should also note that I personally spoke with Karl Rove twice in 1996.  After Ron won the GOP Nomination, mainline Republicans were unsure as to how to treat him.  We reached out to the Bush people.  After my conversations with Rove, he put out the word to key Houston-area, Austin and Victoria Republicans to back Ron Paul.  All of a sudden like a tidal wave all the GOPers came on board our Campaign.   
 
Though privately, Ron leaned non-intervenionist, publicly he was always Pro-Troops, Pro-Veterans, Pro-Defense and quite Patriotic, particularly in his Campaign style. 
 
He made extra sure to attend as many Veteran's events as possible.  And when he couldn't go, he would always send me, as the only Vet on staff to represent him.  He always made it quite clear that I was to emphasize "my views on foreign policy" more so than his non-interventionist views at such events.  And I did. 
 
But after Sept. 11, things changed.  He became morose.  He became bitter, and quite pessimistic. 
 
I had to literally beg him to support the vote authorizing the President to send Troops to Afghanistan.  I actually threatened to resign if he did not vote that way.  And another key District Staffer, practically threatened to resign, as well.  At the last minute Ron voted in favor of the Authorization.  I suspected he only did it, cause he knew if he hadn't he would cause the Republicans in the District to oppose him, and he wouldn't win reelection. 
 
But 9/11 served as a wake up call for me.  I started questioning how it is that I could work for such a man. 
 
Before it was always just a fun-loving disagreement; debating in the car from event to event to pass the time.
 
Now, I saw he was quite serious, and cared even less for how others, even constituents took his views on foreign policy.
 
Ron and I grew apart.  I served as his Travel Aide less and less in 2002/03. 
 
Finally one day in the Summer of 2003, he called on me to accompany him to an event in Victoria.  He was acting quite strange in the car.  He kept prodding me on foreign policy.  I knew he was trying to get me to debate the War in Iraq with him.  But I kept my cool the whole trip.
 
Finally, when we reached Victoria, I made a slight comeback, that I didn't think his particular view on the War was correct.  He jumped out of the car and lunged at me. Poking his finger into my chest, he looked me in the eye and said, "I will have nobody working for me on my staff who supports the War in Iraq, even you."  I'd only seen this look on Ron maybe once or twice in all my 12 years working for him.  He was clearly quite angry with me. 
 
I knew he was trying to provoke me so that he could have justification to fire me.  But I kept my cool. 
 
For 6 months after than we didn't speak. 
 
Finally, Chief of Staff Tom Lizardo suggested that Ron and I not talking to each other was not helpful to the "atmosphere" in the District offices.  I offered to my friend Tom to resign.  We discussed a date, two months out, and a compensation package and I agreed. 
 
I've been asked by others if my former boss is an Anti-Semite.  My answer is an emphatic NO.  I am half Jewish.  I am familiar with Anti-Semites.  Ron is not one of them.
 
But I would say he's very insensitive to issues concerning Israel and for other concerns of Jewish Americans. 
 
Houston Jews were always suspicious of Ron Paul.  But Ron could always point to me as his "Jewish Staffer."  He would even send me to Synagogues in the District and to Jewish events.  But I do remember one time, when a group of Houston Jewish Young Republicans wanted to lobby the Congressman on some issues.  I begged Ron to meet with them.  He was very hesitant.  He finally agreed.  But the meeting turned out to be a disaster.  The Jewish YRs came all the way from Houston, and all Ron did was berate them in our District Office about how the Israel Lobby was too powerful in Washington, and other issues.  He also got defensive when the Jewish YRs expressed concern over Palestinian violence against Israel. 
 
I ran down the hallway after the meeting chasing the group, and apologized profusely to them. 
 
After 9/11 Ron also became much more upfront in his anti-Israel views.  He'd even criticize Israel in public speeches which would make me cringe. 
 
Ron Paul and I agree on about 95% of all domestic issues.  We disagree on a myriad of foreign policy and defense issues.  Still, he was my boss.  He was paying me, so I was obligated to toe the line.
 
This is not why I think less of him today.
 
Rather, what concerns me most was the fact that for many years he played both sides of the aisle.  In the very Conservative South Texas CD, he was always Mr. Red, White, and Blue.  If he couldn't make a Veterans event, he made damn sure that his one Vet on staff could go, even if it was just 8 VFW guys meeting for a couple hours 3 hours drive away. Ron was very careful to portray himself in the District as Pro-Troops, and even Pro-Defense. 
 
But after 9/11 and most especially after the War in Iraq, he played up his non-interventionist side to a national audience.  This while still keeping the facade of Pro-Troops/Pro-Defense in the District.  As late as last year I got a constituent mailing from RP with 4 pages of nothing but Patriotic/Pro-Troops/Pro-Veterans information from the Congressional office.  I suspect the reason why RP has gone south on foreign policy for the national audience is simple: To gain more dollars from a National fundraising base, and to gain more National media attention from Liberal media sources.   
 
In closing let me just say, that I don't believe his views represent the views of Congressional District 14 any more.  The District, which I live in, is quite considerably more Conservative of foreign policy/defense issues than Ron Paul. 
 
I would endorse Chris Peden, or some other Republican candidate other than Ron Paul for this seat.
________________________________________



Eric Dondero is a US Navy Veteran, former Libertarian Party National Committeeman, Founder of the Republican Liberty Caucus and fmr. Senior Aide to US Congressman Ron Paul R-TX.  He is now a national Republican Political Consultant based in Houston, Texas. 

Thanks to Edd Hendee at KSEV in Houston for passing this information along.  Do your country a favor and go donate to Eyes On The Border; something Dr. Ron "Strangelove" Paul surely has not done.

A big "thank you" to the one and only Ace of Spades for linking this up on his fine blog.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truther; asseenonstormfront; assenonstormfront; cutandrun; electionpresident; elections; isolationists; keywordspammer; mrspaulsshrimp; nationalsecurity; paul; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulhaters; rino; ronpaul; ronpaulcult; rupaul; scampi; truthers; wildshrimp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last
To: wideawake
Even the most ardent Rittberg haters that I have discovered on the web so far admit that these are rumors.

Could be true. Maybe his wife really was mugged three times in Houston.
Then again, maybe the rumors about Craig, Foley and Haggard are lies.
.
121 posted on 09/04/2007 10:30:25 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Re: Your tagline

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1872558/posts?page=1


122 posted on 09/04/2007 10:37:54 AM PDT by listenhillary (millions crippled by the war on poverty....but we won't pull out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: radioman
Could be true.

So there is no truth.

Maybe his wife really was mugged three times in Houston.

I used to work in a not-so-nice NYC neighborhood and I was mugged twice in a three-month period, despite the fact that I'm a guy and I was 6'2 and 225 lbs and an active 20-something rugby player at the time.

Houston is more dangerous than NYC and his wife is apparently a diminutive middle-aged woman.

It's certainly possible.

Then again, maybe the rumors about Craig, Foley and Haggard are lies.

Your allegations against Rittberg are indeed rumors.

Craig was arrested (his arrest report is on line as is the interrogation tape) and pled guilty.

Mark Foley's IMs are a matter of public record and he admitted publicly through his attorney that he sent them.

Ted Haggard also publicly admitted his misdeeds in statements given to the media.

Your three examples make for terrible analogies.

They can't mask the fact that you can't back up what you said.

123 posted on 09/04/2007 10:50:50 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
So there is no truth.
LOL!
I was a agreeing with you when I said "could be true" about the rumors.

I used to work in a not-so-nice NYC neighborhood and I was mugged twice in a three-month period, despite the fact that I'm a guy and I was 6'2 and 225 lbs and an active 20-something rugby player at the time.

Uh huh...She was beat up by muggers three times in one year in Houston? If you tell me your wife was beat up by muggers I'll sympathize with you and her. When it gets to the third time I'll suspect her beatings are a little closer to home.

It's certainly possible.
It certainly is. It's also possible that OJ is innocent.
.
124 posted on 09/04/2007 11:22:00 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; AndreaThorn
That is emphatically what he did not say. He was asked point blank if the US was involved in 9/11 and all he said was "I've seen no evidence of that." Not: "No, absolutely not." Not: "Of course not, and such claims are irresponsible." But: "I've seen no evidence."

Wrong again, wideawake, and I explained this to you just 3 days ago. When asked if he agrees with the truthers, Congressman Paul answered, "Absolutely not". In other words, he answered just the way you said he should, and further, you knew that when you made your post.

So the question becomes, why do you keep posting this lie? You know Paul's supporters are familiar with this history. You know we're going to bust you on it. Are you really that desperate to destroy your own credibility? If so, then congratulations. It's now down to zero.

125 posted on 09/04/2007 11:44:30 AM PDT by JTN (‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: JTN
Wrong again, wideawake

Sadly for Ron Paul, I am not.

He says that the US government did not deliberately plot 9/11, but remains silent on the other Truther claim that the government knew it was going to happen and deliberately chose to do nothing, saying he had "seen no evidence" that was the case.

He compounded his ambiguity by stating that there was a "danger" that the US would permit another avoidable terrorist incident to happen in order to justify supposed attacks on civil liberties.

Are you really that desperate to destroy your own credibility? If so, then congratulations. It's now down to zero.

That's a laugh. Ron Paul's credibility is now zero - he has hung himself with his own words.

126 posted on 09/04/2007 12:01:47 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; radioman; Calvinist_Dark_Lord
Wideawake, RP supporters aren’t known for consistence, but this takes the cake.

On the one hand you have.

Calvinist_Dark_Lord: the @$$ kicking you took over the supposed "David Duke endoursment" last week

No one has referred to an actual endorsement, but the point has been made that Paul is apparently comfortable with support from all sorts of nutcakes. Leaving aside the truthers, and even places like anti-war, Lew Rockwell, Joe “I’m obsessed with Jews” Sobran, the Constitution Party, and assorted leftists, this is supported by

The racist remarks in an old newsletter written under his name. At the very least an unidentified racist was obviously close enough to be in a position of trust. To my knowledge never identified of fired.

Support for RP by David Duke’s website, Council of Conservative Citizens and Stormfront, including links to “meet-ups” at Stormfront, and support from similar sites.

Advertisement of Ron Paul as a columnist by American Free Press (Willis Carto)

Radio appearances on Political Cesspool, loosely associated with the CCC. He’s listed above Prussian Blue.

When his campaign was asked about the indicted drug dealer in Canada organizing a support group, they responded that they’ll take support from anywhere.

In the absence of a rejection of their support, there’s more than enough there to establish he’s OK with support from sleazy places. As his campaign indicates.

radioman Uh huh...She was beat up by muggers three times in one year in Houston? If you tell me your wife was beat up by muggers I'll sympathize with you and her. When it gets to the third time I'll suspect her beatings are a little closer to home.

Suddenly the tables turn. With regard to an accusation against a Paul detractor the standards morph. Three assaults, no complaints or witnesses, mean he’s a wife beater. What else could he be?

A clear double standard, but if true it adds wife beaters to potential Paul supporters.

127 posted on 09/04/2007 12:55:48 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: radioman
Uh huh...She was beat up by muggers three times in one year in Houston?

As I pointed out, I who am much larger and stronger than Rittberg's wife, was mugged twice in three months in a city that is much safer than Houston. It really depends on what your routine is.

If someone told me she was mugged three times while shopping in Houston's Galleria district, I would be very suspicious. If someone told me she worked as a teacher in the Third Ward, three times would seem low.

It certainly is. It's also possible that OJ is innocent.

In Simpson's case there actually was physical evidence implicating him which was made available to the public.

In Rittberg's case, I'm still waiting.

128 posted on 09/04/2007 1:04:26 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
In light of your depleted credibility on that issue, i don't see why anybody on this board should accept anything that you have to say...

Who TF do you think you are? Who died and left you king?

In light of Ron Paul's vote For the authorisation of force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, it is apparent that he knows who is responsible for 9/11.

He said the US is responsible for it. I heard him say it at one of the debates.

I used to (emphasis on "used to") like and respect Paul prior to his devolving into moonbattery regarding the Iraq War.

No more.

129 posted on 09/04/2007 2:56:30 PM PDT by sauropod (You can’t spell crap without the AP in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Ping if you haven’t seen this already.
130 posted on 09/04/2007 2:59:20 PM PDT by mnehring (If there's one thing that makes me sick it's when someone tries to hide behind politics- Joey Ramone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
A clear double standard

Yes your double standards certainly are clear.

Support for RP by David Duke’s website, Council of Conservative Citizens and Stormfront, including links to “meet-ups” at Stormfront, and support from similar sites.

Your logic:
Some white supremacists support Ron Paul therefore Ron Paul is a racist.

The folks at StormFront also like Duncan Hunter. Are you posting this nonsense on the Duncan Hunter threads too?
If not, why not?
. .
131 posted on 09/04/2007 3:03:15 PM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If someone told me she was mugged three times while shopping in Houston's Galleria district, I would be very suspicious.

So you think she went shopping on the bad side of town? Three times?
.
132 posted on 09/04/2007 3:06:53 PM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Sadly for Ron Paul, I am not. He says that the US government did not deliberately plot 9/11, but remains silent on the other Truther claim that the government knew it was going to happen and deliberately chose to do nothing, saying he had "seen no evidence" that was the case.

Sorry, you don't get to weasel out of this one. The quote you used was, "I've seen no evidence of that." Since I can't find those words attributed to Dr. Paul anywhere (the first google hit is this page), I assume you're referring to this interview with Dave Weigel of reason magazine. Here's the question he was answering:

The position of the Student Scholars is that 9/11 was executed by the U.S. government. Do you agree or disagree with that?

So he was answering a question about whether he believed the U.S. government was directly involved (the same question to which he has also replied "Absolutely not", in case you decide to try to go down that road again) not whether they knew in advance. That was a cute try, but as I said, I'm somewhat familiar with the history here. Plus I know how to use Google.

He compounded his ambiguity by stating that there was a "danger" that the US would permit another avoidable terrorist incident to happen in order to justify supposed attacks on civil liberties.

Stop digging. You're in deep enough already.

133 posted on 09/04/2007 4:30:02 PM PDT by JTN (‘We achieve much more in peace than…unconstitutional, undeclared wars’ - Dr. Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: radioman
Your logic: Some white supremacists support Ron Paul therefore Ron Paul is a racist....The folks at StormFront also like Duncan Hunter. Are you posting this nonsense on the Duncan Hunter threads too? If not, why not?

No.

You're a liar.

I did not say Ron Paul is a racist.

I did say he tolerates racists, which he does.

Duncan Hunter is supported on Stormfront?

By David Duke?

Willis Carto advertises Duncan Hunter as a columnist?

Duncan Hunter interviews on Cesspool?

Duncan Hunter has racists ghostwriting for him?

I think you're full of cra*, but if you're right, Hunter needs to disassociate himself from these people.

Feel free to address your question to the Hunter people.

So we're clear, yes, I think Ron Paul is comfortable with support from racists, Jewhaters, and assorted anti-war types. After all, they vote.

134 posted on 09/04/2007 8:37:31 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Feel free to address your question to the Hunter people.

No, I'm not going to stoop to your level. I called your BS and raised you. Just fold before you make an even bigger ass of yourself.
.
135 posted on 09/04/2007 8:56:35 PM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: radioman
So you think she went shopping on the bad side of town?

Those who read my post know that I explicitly ruled out such an assumption.

136 posted on 09/05/2007 5:15:47 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: radioman
No, I'm not going to stoop to your level. I called your BS and raised you. Just fold before you make an even bigger ass of yourself.

You addressed none of the issues I raised, you simply fabricated a similar charge against Duncan Hunter. Which you can’t support, because you made it up.

The fact remains, Ron Paul is supported by some unsavory people who he has not disclaimed. You called noting, simply slandered another candidate in a “they all do it” driveby.

137 posted on 09/05/2007 7:24:27 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
"In closing let me just say, that I don't believe his views represent the views of Congressional District 14 any more. The District, which I live in, is quite considerably more Conservative of foreign policy/defense issues than Ron Paul. "

I'm one district over from Ron Paul's District and I am betting that Ron Paul has seen his last days in Congress. Texans in those parts don't fancy his kind.

138 posted on 09/05/2007 7:30:04 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
You addressed none of the issues I raised,
LOL!
What issues? The Political Cesspool is a Christian Conservative radio station. Yes Ron Paul was interviewed, along with Ezola Foster who is African-American
Paul Gottfried who is Jewish
Pat Buchanan
Dr. Chuck Baldwin Pastor, Radio Host, Former Vice Presidential Nominee (Constitution Party 2004)
Peter Brimelow - Author of Alien Nation; former editor of Forbes Magazine and National Review
Senator John DeCamp - State Senator (Nebraska), author of "The Franklin Coverup"
William Flax - Legendary Conservative Writer
Jim Gilchrist - Co-Founder of the Minutemen Project
Ray Herrera --- National Rally Spokesman for the Minuteman Project
Shannon McGauley - Leader of the Texas Minutemen
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts - Syndicated Columnist, Former Secretary of the Treasury
And yes, David Duke. They interview anyone who is in the news and even interview musicians, singers, actors and various kooks such as yourself.

What other issues have you?
Ghost writers? Name them.

Are you a liberal?
Your talking points are straight from Rosie O'Donnell...
.
139 posted on 09/05/2007 9:33:15 AM PDT by radioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: radioman
What issues? The Political Cesspool is a Christian Conservative radio station

The Political Cesspool is a "conservative radio station" linked as I understand it to the Council of Conservative Citizens, a "conservative" racist group. I presume you condemn the latter, imo a political candidate should avoid that type of venue like the plague.

What other issues have you? Ghost writers? Name them.

That you're not aware of the racist newsletter ghost authored for Paul's newsletter betrays your ignorance, perhaps willful, of your candidate. I can't identify him because Paul hasn't identified him, but he has apologized. Clear evidence

Willis Carto, a prominent neonazi Holocaust denier, advertises Ron Paul as a columnist in his print publication. Are you ok with that? The Citizens Informer published by the CCC prints him as well.

An indicted drug dealer is organizing "meet-ups" for him in Canada. The campaign says that's OK. Is it OK with you? If yes, you can't criticize Hillary for the same thing.

In my view a political candidate needs to disassociate himself from support like this. I fully recognize that others disagree.

140 posted on 09/05/2007 11:01:28 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson