This from your Washington Post article.
“Candidates have been campaigning up a storm, yet the national polls have hardly budged. No second-tier hopeful has made a dramatic move. Most normal, non-politics-obsessed people still aren’t paying attention. There aren’t five people in America who can identify Mike Gravel on sight, and no one knows Duncan Hunter from Duncan Hines. And who’s Ron Paul? Why doesn’t he have a last name? Does he know George Ringo?”
That’s a good line...no one knows Duncan Hunter from Duncan Hines. Very truthful of you to point that out for me.
I think sometimes his supporters do not realize just how much their work is cut out for them. He is so obscure. How important is a member of the House of Representatives from California to anyone from the midwest? He doesn’t even get noticed in my state.
Fred outpolls him even in California.
I did read your links. He favors deporting as a general principle but does not say specifically that he would deport all of them, or how. [I have to work for a living, had to wait until after work to read them.]
Shoo them out? What does that mean?
We’ve got so many issues in this country that are important, he chooses this as his important issue and can’t spell out in specifics how to do it.
Because it can’t be done.
My only comment is that I would fully expect Fred to outpoll Duncan in CA.
Duncan represents a single congressional district and has never run statewide in CA. Even his congressional district isn’t highly visible when compared to those around LA and up north. And given that Fred is an actor, CA should be fertile ground. For those politically savvy activists who support Fred in CA, no doubt they also know a lot about his other careers besides acting.
I’m just giving reasons why it’s not to Duncan’s advantage in CA merely to be a Californian. I don’t mean to suggest that you aren’t aware of the points I’m making. I’m making them for the benefit of those who lurk and read rather than for your benefit.