To: Petronski
Yes, you are right. I did not indicate that Thompson voted against
convictionon the perjury charge. By the way I am sure you must have thought President Clinton did not commit perjury.
As to bad grammar. I don't know. Most posts are colloquial. As to knowing that he voted for conviction on the obstruction of justice charge, please note (if you did read my original post) that this fact was included in the post.
Regards
To: shrinkermd; Petronski
As to knowing that he voted for conviction on the obstruction of justice charge, please note (if you did read my original post) that this fact was included in the post. But that makes your comment that Thompson voted against the impeachment (sic) a knowingly false statement. A vote for conviction on either charge is a vote in favor of removal from office rather than a "vote against the impeachment".
56 posted on
08/30/2007 3:59:41 PM PDT by
VRWCmember
(Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
To: shrinkermd
Spin spin spin, liar.
Even when I quote your errors back to you, after you’ve been corrected, you still can’t recognize them.
You are obviously not wedded to the truth.
64 posted on
08/30/2007 4:04:47 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
To: shrinkermd
Yes, you are right. I did not indicate that Thompson voted against convictionon the perjury charge.That's NOT why you're a liar. That's why you don't know whereof you speak.
The reason you are a liar is that you state that Thompson voted against impeachment. Again, Thompson voted to convict on Obstruction, and only one count is needed, liar.
65 posted on
08/30/2007 4:07:49 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson