Your memory is getting faulty Badeye.
Howard Dean was the darling of the MSM during the last campaign season. The guy was in the news constantly, and if you believed the MSM propaganda, was a shoe in for the Democratic nomination
...Until Kerry started kicking his ass in the Primaries. Dean was entirely a creation of the media, and none of that translated into votes.
By contrast, Ron Paul can't get decent media coverage at all. The MSM goes out of their way to ignore him, especially after Sean Hannity's meltdown on Faux Nuze. (in between the 24/7 missing pretty blond girl of the week coverage)
In Paul's favour, i don't see him doing any screaming soon.
Yep, haven’t seen anything like it since Dean in 03.....
Your memory is getting faulty Badeye.
Howard Dean was the darling of the MSM during the last campaign season. The guy was in the news constantly, and if you believed the MSM propaganda, was a shoe in for the Democratic nomination
Nope. The MSM has ALWAYS treated Republicans this way.
The comparision is valid as it relates to those claiming the ‘netroots’ for Ron Paul are overwhelming the nation, just as the ‘Deaniacs’ claimed the same in 03.
As you and I have now both noted, once the primaries started in Deans case he was toast...the same will happen to Paul.