I have seen this odd mind set, equating a bar with a bathroom, so much right here on this conservative website that I’m “seriesly stuned.”
I don’t expect the sodomites to understand. After all, they are people who identify themselves by their sex life. They see everywhere as a place to troll for sex. It is their habit to sexualize everything and every place. They can’t comprehend that normal people don’t think the same way.
I am interested in knowing if these people who think bars and bathrooms are the same are reasoning through sodomite brains, or are just brainwashed kids, or are a whole generation of people with poor thinking skills.
You posted: I have seen this odd mind set, equating a bar with a bathroom, so much right here on this conservative website that I’m “seriesly stuned.”
I don’t expect the sodomites to understand. After all, they are people who identify themselves by their sex life. They see everywhere as a place to troll for sex. It is their habit to sexualize everything and every place. They can’t comprehend that normal people don’t think the same way.I am interested in knowing if these people who think bars and bathrooms are the same are reasoning through sodomite brains, or are just brainwashed kids, or are a whole generation of people with poor thinking skills.
***
You have made some suggestions about me that are simply wrong. If this Senator did what is claimed, and it looks like he did, he is a sleaze and scum. I am not a supporter of homosexuality. I think the lifestyle is wrong, although I understand that the Supreme Court has, to a degree, legitimized it. My thinking is solely related to whether what Larry Craig did is illegal, given what we allow to take place elsewhere. The question is not whether it is right, but whether it is illegal. Certainly having sex in a public restroom is illegal. I don’t think Craig did that or was charged with it (at least not in this case). He was not charged with leering or ogling anyone in that bathroom. Prostitution was not involved, as homosexual men seem to be willing to do these things for free. What Craig seems to have done was to inquire, through some understood gay communication system, as to whether his stall partner (policeman, as it turns out) wanted to have sex. Of course, Craig says that was not what he was doing, but that doesn’t seem credible.
If he had simply asked the cop just outside the restroom if he would like to have sex, it would have been just as wrong, but not illegal, right? If they had been washing at the sink after relieving themselves he could have asked, right? It would be no less disgusting, but would it have broken the law? That is my only question.
I am no gen-x’er, by the way. I am 50 years old, married, father of two. And, long long ago, in a campus restroom during undergrad years, this same thing happened to me. I wasn’t sure what was being asked by the guy who tried to pass paper and pencil to me under the stall, but I let him know in no uncertain terms that I was not interested, and he was smart to leave quickly.
Elsewhere on campus there was a nearly constant effort to get women to consent to sex, and it was not limited to bars. It took place everywhere men and women were together. That didn’t make it right, but I doubt that there was any law against it.
That is because we have PLENTY of degenerates here, infiltrators, passing as "conservatives," in order to move opinions to the left on everything. Especially the fags, after all that is their whole purpose in life! :)
I can spot them on the first two sentences. Many of those are the ones pushing for the 3 frontrunners... anything to delude social conservative principles is to their advantage, in their eyes. So don't kid yourselve or be surprised, they are here in droves!