Is there anything more pathetic than party hacks saying that Ron Paul is not pro-life?
As a matter of fact, there is...
Someone claiming to be pro-life but refusing to protect life, in the womb, in Iraq or in Manhattan, is MUCH worse.
Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Voted NO on forbidding human cloning for reproduction & medical research. (Feb 2003)
It's beyond pathetic and it's something that'll make even DUers blush. Anyone who implies that Paul is pro-abortion should have their posting privileges suspended, period.