[t_skoz]

I’ve posted that on 2 threads now today alone. The anti-Paul’s won’t read it. It doesn’t fit their agenda. The National Ledger article could have been written by one of the FR hacks. I’m not worried about it. Here in NH Ron Paul is the only candidate with any real grassroots support. I even know some of the Rudy people who are paid, they are interested in Ron Paul as well.

[mnehring]

I’ve posted that on 2 threads now today alone. The anti-Paul’s won’t read it. It doesn’t fit their agenda.

No, it doesn't fit the world today, ie, that we are at war. IMHO, Reagan would disagree with how the current war is being fought, but not by sticking his head up his ass like Paul, instead, I wouldn't be surprised if he dropped a nuke on Baghdad. If Reagan went into Grenada, you know he sure as hell would have taken out Iraq, Afghanistan, and any other terrorist supporting country.

[deport]

That Paul fellar is really tearing them up in public support across the fruited plain.

Paul's numbers:

• Fox News: 3%
• Gallup: 3%
• Quinnipiac: 2%
• CNN: 1%
• USA Today: 2%
• Newsweek: 2%

And so it goes...... Make this your last hurrah.

RUN PAUL RUN

[OCCASparky]

Here in NH Ron Paul is the only candidate with any real grassroots support.

I believe the term you're looking for is astroturfing.

Che-Porter was a grassroots candidate too--look where she got us. Paul cannot and will not win in NH. Thank God we don't have an open primary.