Distraction is a techique used when someone is loosing an argument. You are trying to get this thread on another subject because the article makes so much sense.
I think the following is another point from the article that is worth a closer look.
“First, he’s (Paul is) not a constitutionalist, except when it serves his political agenda which is that of an isolationist liberal-tarian, not a conservative. When he is playing constitutionalist, as in the case of the war on terror (specifically in Iraq), he is a foolish constitutionalist. He claims that the constitution somehow prevents us from protecting our national security interests abroad. He also fails to recognize that the national security threats are much different today, as compared to those present in 1776.”
Repeating other people's lies does not become you. You should give up the habit.
“He also fails to recognize that the national security threats are much different today, as compared to those present in 1776.”
I’m not so sure...:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/08/23/daily-show-three-generations-of-america-to-the-rescue/