Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Split Verdict for Officer at Abu Ghraib (LtCol Jordan acquitted of 3 counts)
Forbes.com ^ | August 28, 2007 | DAVID DISHNEAU

Posted on 08/28/2007 4:44:16 PM PDT by RDTF

FORT MEADE, Md. - A military court Tuesday acquitted an Army officer of failing to control U.S. soldiers who abused detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, but it found him guilty of disobeying an order not to discuss the abuse investigation.

Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan was the only officer and the last of 12 defendants to go to trial in the 2003 Abu Ghraib scandal, which embarrassed the Pentagon and shocked the Muslim world.

The allegations at the U.S.-run prison came to light with the release of pictures of U.S. soldiers smiling while detainees, some of them naked, were held on leashes or in painful and humiliating positions at the prison. Jordan, 51, never appeared in the inflammatory photos, but he was accused of fostering a climate conducive to abuse.

The jury of nine colonels and one brigadier general deliberate for about seven hours before issuing its verdicts Tuesday.

It acquitted Jordan of three counts: cruelty and maltreatment for subjecting detainees to forced nudity and intimidation by dogs; dereliction of a duty to properly train and supervise soldiers in humane interrogation rules; and failing to obey a lawful general order by ordering dogs used for interrogations without higher approval.

The jury found him guilty of one: disobeying a general's order not to talk to others about the investigation into the abuse.

Jordan, a reservist from Fredericksburg, Va., stood at attention facing the jury as the panel president, a brigadier general, read the verdict.

He faces a maximum sentence of five years.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abughraib; courtmartial; iraq; ltcoljordan; usarmy

1 posted on 08/28/2007 4:44:19 PM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RDTF

I notice the MSM has refused to cover these trials.

They are afraid the public will find out that their reporting of the incident, did not match the facts at all.


2 posted on 08/28/2007 4:51:21 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
You are correct.

The MSM reported (for years) that it was "torture." It was abuse, not torture.

They cannot let the public find that out.

3 posted on 08/28/2007 4:55:03 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

I hope he sues big time; although, it will be out of our tax money to pay him off.

Our tax money is being spent for worse things.

Thank you George.


4 posted on 08/28/2007 5:05:23 PM PDT by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF; 1stbn27; 2111USMC; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 68 grunt; A.A. Cunningham; ASOC; AirForceBrat23; ...

Bet you missed this on the news.


5 posted on 08/28/2007 6:22:24 PM PDT by freema (Proud Marine Niece, Daughter, Wife, Friend, Sister, Aunt, Cousin, Mother, and FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freema

Thanks for the ping

Semper Fi,
Kelly


6 posted on 08/28/2007 6:37:49 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Found guilty of talking about his being railroaded was a crime.


7 posted on 08/28/2007 6:53:03 PM PDT by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

I suprised they didn’t try to hit him with conduct unbecoming. They always seem to get troops with that one.


8 posted on 08/28/2007 9:17:54 PM PDT by vlad_the_impaler007 (I have not yet begun to fight- John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
I notice the MSM has refused to cover these trials

WaPo did a pre-emptive article last week on how inept the prosecution was in presenting its case in this trial. The message to libs was, "There's no real case against this guy. He'll walk. No story here."
9 posted on 08/29/2007 7:11:30 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

He should be sentenced to having to wear a pair of women’s panties on his head!


10 posted on 08/29/2007 7:54:10 AM PDT by G-Bear (Religiously, five times a day, I turn my back on Mecca and fart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson