To: Kaslin
i'd say invading their country in the first place was a severe interference in their domestic affairs, too.
and before you flame me, i have always supported the war. just not the execution of it.
5 posted on
08/26/2007 8:37:41 AM PDT by
thefactor
To: thefactor
I know. You're just trying to be helpful.
*sigh*
8 posted on
08/26/2007 8:39:12 AM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(Criticize me if you will but just don't circumcise me any more.)
To: thefactor
i'd say invading their country in the first place was a severe interference in their domestic affairs, too Refreshing honesty. Thanks.
To: thefactor
“i’d say invading their country in the first place was a severe interference in their domestic affairs, too.”
Your point being what??????
Maliki needs to start bitching about the initial invasion????
For what purpose did you even write that? And whoever wrote that this was a great point needs to re-medicate sleep and repeat.
To: thefactor
i'd say invading their country in the first place was a severe interference in their domestic affairs, too.May I remind you that the war is a continuation of the first Gulf war?
20 posted on
08/26/2007 9:15:25 AM PDT by
Kaslin
(The Surge is working and the li(e)berals know it)
To: thefactor
i'd say invading their country in the first place was a severe interference in their domestic affairs, too. Yep
I'm sure they'd much rather still be under the murderous rule of Saddam -
BTW, you 'out' yourself by using the word "invading" - rather than "liberating"
F-slip...
29 posted on
08/26/2007 10:19:52 AM PDT by
maine-iac7
( "...but you can't fool all of the people all the time." LINCOLN)
To: thefactor
Big difference. We removed the terrorist brutal Saddam Hussein regime which was too dangerous to keep after 9/11. The current Iraqi government is democratically elected and they are our allies as well.
32 posted on
08/26/2007 10:30:29 AM PDT by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson