Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thefactor

“i’d say invading their country in the first place was a severe interference in their domestic affairs, too.”

Your point being what??????

Maliki needs to start bitching about the initial invasion????

For what purpose did you even write that? And whoever wrote that this was a great point needs to re-medicate sleep and repeat.


11 posted on 08/26/2007 8:51:09 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Vanbasten

I’d say 9/11 was a severe interference in our domestic affairs.


14 posted on 08/26/2007 9:00:24 AM PDT by Maumee (wt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Vanbasten

MEANING that a little interference in domestic affairs in a place like Iraq isn’t neccessarily a bad thing. Seemed obvious to me what Vanbasten’s point was.

Maliki hasn’t been exactly grateful to the U.S. as far as I can tell.


28 posted on 08/26/2007 10:18:18 AM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Vanbasten
come on bro. i just think it was a poor choice of words for the PM. that's it. it's too easy to rebutt the point and talk about the military action.

if we were allowed to fight this war the way war is supposed to be fought, we would be in a much more enviable position right now.

thank you very much ACLU and the democrats at large...

46 posted on 08/26/2007 2:03:28 PM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson