So why the constant nitpicking of Paul? -- Do you really believe he is some sort of boogyman?
I’m not nitpicking him. I think the article made a relevant point. His supporters make all sorts of nonsensical claims on FR, from Ron as the heir to Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy to the unconstitutionality of the income and social security taxes. Are you suggesting that shouldn’t be addressed on long threads, allowing those unfamiliar with him to accept those positions?