[SJackson]

I’m not nitpicking him. I think the article made a relevant point. His supporters make all sorts of nonsensical claims on FR, from Ron as the heir to Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy to the unconstitutionality of the income and social security taxes. Are you suggesting that shouldn’t be addressed on long threads, allowing those unfamiliar with him to accept those positions?

[tpaine]

Like you, I like Hunter, Thompson, or Gingrich.
I also like Paul.
But we all know the only viable candidate of that bunch is Thompson.

So why the constant nitpicking of Paul? -- Do you really believe he is some sort of boogyman?

I'm not nitpicking him.

Get real. You've been posting hissy fit articles like this one for quite some time.

I think the article made a relevant point. His supporters make all sorts of nonsensical claims on FR, from Ron as the heir to Ronald Reagan's foreign policy to the unconstitutionality of the income and social security taxes.

Big deal. Every candidate ever known has had a contingent of "nonsensical supporters".

Are you suggesting that shouldn't be addressed on long threads, allowing those unfamiliar with him to accept those positions?

No, I'm suggesting that you've gone off the deep end in suggesting that Paul's platform is what? -- Un american?; - unconstitutional?

[Allegra]