Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MichiganConservative
Well, I wasn't there. I'm here. Who? And who is less hypocritical, in you opinion?

There's not all in yet, but likely Hunter or Thompson though I like Gingrich.

I look forward to your Hunter/Thompson examples of hypocracy, deflecting criticism from Paul.

I answered your question, can you answer mine? Wikipedia, though not my favorite source, suffices for this exercise.

Paul and his supporters declare the income and social security tax unconstitutional. What are his plans for running the government after stripping around $2.2 trillion out of the governments $2.4 trillion revenue stream. Simply ceasing social security benefits (and his supporters say he won't do that) won't do it. How will he protect the country without a military? Any serious thought given to these minor inconveniences? Who are his economic advisors?

BTW, if he wan't to balance the budget, we have no revenue at all.

And if you're going to tell me flat (income) tax or fair (sales) tax, let's play the Roon Paul supporter game and please, provide the precise location of the word flat or sales in the Constitution.

-----------------

United States federal budget, 2006
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget,_2006
Total Receipts

Estimated receipts for fiscal year 2006 are $2.2 trillion. This expected income is broken down by the following sources:

[edit] Total Spending

The President's budget for 2006 totals $2.6 trillion. This budget request is broken down by the following expenditures:

[edit] Adjustments

[edit] 2006 Deficit Estimate

(The amount that government spending exceeds total receipts)


32 posted on 08/26/2007 8:06:23 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Like you, I like Hunter, Thompson, or Gingrich. I also like Paul.
But we all know the only viable candidate of that bunch is Thompson.

So why the constant nitpicking of Paul? -- Do you really believe he is some sort of boogyman?

51 posted on 08/26/2007 9:12:39 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Let's see here... Your list:


* $544.8 billion (20.90%) - Social Security
* $512.1 billion (18.00%) - Defense
* $359.5 billion (13.79%) - Unemployment and welfare
* $345.7 billion (13.26%) - Medicare
* $268.4 billion (10.30%) - Medicaid and other health related
* $211.1 billion (8.10%) - Interest on debt
* $88.7 billion (3.40%) - Education and training
* $70.7 billion (2.71%) - Transportation
* $68.4 billion (2.62%) - Veterans' benefits
* $43.1 billion (1.65%) - Administration of justice
* $38.4 billion (1.47%) - Foreign affairs
* $31.2 billion (1.20%) - Natural resources and environment
* $26.0 billion (1.00%) - Agriculture
* $24.0 billion (0.92%) - Science and technology
* $19.1 billion (0.73%) - Community and regional development
* $17.8 billion (0.68%) - General government
* $2.1 billion (0.08%) - Energy

My list:

* $544.8 billion (20.90%) - Social Security
* $512.1 billion (18.00%) - Defense
* $359.5 billion (13.79%) - Unemployment and welfare
* $345.7 billion (13.26%) - Medicare
* $268.4 billion (10.30%) - Medicaid and other health related
* $211.1 billion (8.10%) - Interest on debt
* $88.7 billion (3.40%) - Education and training
* $70.7 billion (2.71%) - Transportation
* $68.4 billion (2.62%) - Veterans' benefits
* $43.1 billion (1.65%) - Administration of justice
* $38.4 billion (1.47%) - Foreign affairs
* $31.2 billion (1.20%) - Natural resources and environment
* $26.0 billion (1.00%) - Agriculture
* $24.0 billion (0.92%) - Science and technology
* $19.1 billion (0.73%) - Community and regional development
* $17.8 billion (0.68%) - General government
* $2.1 billion (0.08%) - Energy

See how easy that was? Nothing left that doesn't fit the Constitution and now we can pare taxes down to nearly zilch. I'm also sure that more could be cut out of administration of justice and general government, as well... with far fewer feeding bureaucraps to starve, we need far less general government anyway...

136 posted on 08/26/2007 7:07:09 PM PDT by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson