Skip to comments.
Hitler was a socialist
johnjayray.tripod.com ^
| John J. Ray
Posted on 08/25/2007 9:37:52 AM PDT by Renfield
~~~~~snip~~~~
There is surely no doubt that the man Feser describes sounds very much like a mainstream Leftist by current standards. But who is the man concerned? It is a historically accurate description of Adolf Hitler. Hitler was not only a socialist in his own day but he would even be a mainstream socialist in MOST ways today. Feser does not mention Hitler's antisemitism above, of course, but that too seems once again to have become mainstream among the Western-world Left in the early years of the 21st century. See here for more on that.
One way in which Hitler was unlike modern American Leftist political leaders, however, is that he was to a considerable extent a genuine man of culture. The photo below shows him in white tie and tails attending the Wagner opera festival at Bayreuth in 1939. There is no doubt of his real devotion to opera -- and indeed to classical music generally. Any claim that a devotion to high culture is especially virtuous does therefore tend to be undermined by Hitler's example -- if that is not too ad hominem.
~~~~snip~~~~
(Excerpt) Read more at jonjayray.tripod.com ...
TOPICS: Germany; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: communism; hitler; moralabsolutes; nazism; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
To: Moonman62
The people you mentioned were COMMUNISTS, not socialists.
81
posted on
08/25/2007 11:51:28 AM PDT
by
stm
(Fred Thompson in 08! Return our country to the era of Reagan Conservatism now.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Nazi is really only short for National - the first two syllables are so pronounced in German. But you are correct about him being a type of Socialist. Remember too that he made so many Folks-things (”of the people,” sort of). Volksbank, Volkswagen, etc.
82
posted on
08/25/2007 11:51:49 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
83
posted on
08/25/2007 11:52:51 AM PDT
by
Sherman Logan
(Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
To: RC2
Now doesnt that sound familiar when considering Hillary? She doesnt like anything about our way of life and is always saying it all has to change.Didn't Bill run on a "change" platform?
84
posted on
08/25/2007 11:59:12 AM PDT
by
JPJones
To: InterceptPoint
If by Right Wing, you mean patriotic, which is the more understood meaning of the term, then Hitler couldn’t have been Right Wing. Patriotism implies that you don’t want to do harm to your country and wish it to truly progress and prosper. It doesn’t mean that you want you country to be imperialistic.
85
posted on
08/25/2007 12:00:37 PM PDT
by
TheThinker
(You don't support the troops if you undermine the war they are fighting right now.)
To: stm
name one socialist state that is not ruled by a dictator.
86
posted on
08/25/2007 12:08:46 PM PDT
by
JoeA
(JoeA / The defintion of insantity is repeating an action and expecting a different result.)
To: Chi-townChief
87
posted on
08/25/2007 12:10:11 PM PDT
by
JoeA
(JoeA / The defintion of insantity is repeating an action and expecting a different result.)
To: SAJ
'Socialism' is by traditional definition 'government ownership of the means of production', with a traditional example typically being the Soviet Union. Similarly, 'fascism' is by definition 'government control of the means of production', with a typical example being Nazi Germany or Italy under Mussolini.
I learned it differently:
Socialism means the government controls the economy
Communism means government ownership of the means of production.
Another distinction is that communism is international socialism. Mussolini, rejecting Marx, discovered that many people responded well to patriotic socialism. He combined Italian patriotism with socialism. He advanced the term fascism which indicated strength through unity as in a bundle of sticks tied together. ("Fasces: a bundle of rods containing an ax with the blade projecting, borne before Roman magistrates as an emblem of official power"). Hitler followed Mussolinis example of patriotic socialism - National Socialism (NAZISM). There is debate about the actual origin of the term Nazism, but (German) national socialism sums it up pretty well.
Socialism and communism tend toward being anti-market, which they call "anti-capitalist." They all generate support by taking stirring up envy and resentment of the rich.
I too believe Hitler was a socialist as he showed little to no restraint in wielding power, without being a king or emperor while keeping the trappings of legitimate government.
Hillery appears to want unconstrained power. She might play the patriot card if it seems to work. But I think her instincts are more toward international socialism. I haven't heard any rhetoric about nationalizing industry from her. I would not put it past her if it seems to get support.
88
posted on
08/25/2007 12:17:03 PM PDT
by
ChessExpert
(Reagan dismantled the Russian empire of 21 conquered nations)
To: ChessExpert
Her rhetoric does include nationalizing the health care industry, however like the Nazis she seems bent toward controlling through government regulation the means of production.
89
posted on
08/25/2007 12:25:04 PM PDT
by
gscc
To: stm
COMMUNISTS are SOCIALISTS.
90
posted on
08/25/2007 12:26:23 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Moonman62
Socialist are communists with a kinder gentler face but with the same end goals. Kinder and gentler goes well in the West.
91
posted on
08/25/2007 12:27:50 PM PDT
by
gscc
To: Renfield
This question comes up over and over again. My two cents is
here and
here and on other threads.
If somebody says "Hitler was a right-winger like Reagan or Bush" I object. Things were a lot more complicated than that.
The same applies if somebody says "Hitler was a socialist, like Norman Thomas or Olof Palme or Hillary Clinton." It's more complicated than that as well.
Hitler mixed the left-wing and right-wing ideas of his time and place. To make him out to be a simple right-winger or left-winger of our own day would be a mistake.
Left-wingers tend to think the left was always anti-racist, feminist, pacifist, and whatever they dream it is today. They're wrong. American Right-wingers assume that the right was always about capitalism and freedom. They don't know much about the old European right.
People who think that the left is and always was about hearts and flowers and loving-kindness are delusional, but those who think that because they follow Rand or Peikoff or Mises that they are somehow outside of the forces that make for evil in the world are likewise self-deceiving and annoying.
In both cases Hitler and the Nazis aren't seen in themselves, but are just used as sticks to beat the other side.
Hitler's thinking and Churchill's weren't poles apart when it came to things like the welfare state. That was the philosophy of the day. What counts are the differences between Hitler and Churchill, not the differences between Hitler and some fool of a Peikoff.
92
posted on
08/25/2007 12:28:14 PM PDT
by
x
To: gscc
93
posted on
08/25/2007 12:28:46 PM PDT
by
ChessExpert
(Reagan dismantled the Russian empire of 21 conquered nations)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Excellent point . I agree %100
94
posted on
08/25/2007 12:31:37 PM PDT
by
sonic109
To: Renfield
Hitler was an asshole. A very sick, sick living organism.
95
posted on
08/25/2007 12:34:14 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(Midnight Hallway Hockey scores: Cats 3-Humans 0)
To: stm
Socialist want a collective society of relative equalsWould you say that Chavez of Venezuela or Mugabe of Zimbabwe Socialists?
I think they are dictators using the umbrella of socialism to advance themselves...
96
posted on
08/25/2007 12:37:10 PM PDT
by
John123
("What good fortune for the governments that the people do not think" -- Adolf Hitler)
To: Renfield
I knew there was something about Hitler that I despised.
97
posted on
08/25/2007 12:46:38 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(What kind of lunatics murder their own babies to make the labor force dependent upon illegal aliens?)
To: stm
Many of the original party leaders were clearly socialist. For the first 10+ years of the party, the socialists were probably stronger than the nationalists. It was only when Hitler needed the money of the industrialists that he promised to deal with them (which he finally did in 1934). Gregor and Otto Strasser were the most notable leaders of the socialist wing of the party. (Otto had come to the Nazis from the socialists).
98
posted on
08/25/2007 12:49:21 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: Kozak
99
posted on
08/25/2007 12:50:11 PM PDT
by
Renfield
(How come there aren't any football teams with pink uniforms?)
To: Gandalf_The_Gray; Chi-townChief
But he got the trains to run on time. That was Mussolini,Hitler built the Autobahn.
HA! Torrance CA's buses run exactly on the hour. Need I say more? I hate that town :(
100
posted on
08/25/2007 12:54:05 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
(Midnight Hallway Hockey scores: Cats 3-Humans 0)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson