Posted on 08/24/2007 3:26:56 PM PDT by doug from upland
Breaking news for you, FReepers. In this sworn declaration presented to Judge Aurelio Munoz in Los Angeles Superior Court on April 7, 2006, Hillary Clinton declared that she knew of no arrangement for her husband to work for Peter Paul's company, Stan Lee Media. Well, what a surprise. She lied. Perhaps Robert Ray would call it being "factually innacurate." That is how he described her testimony before the grand jury when she was first lady.
In connection with a film about Hillary that is currently in production, (not our documentary film), Peter was on camera today taking a polygraph test. The test was administered by a man who was trained by the Department of Defense for the Postal Inspector's Office. That is the premier training available.
Peter passed with flying colors. Despite Hillary's denials, Peter was shown to be telling the truth about the Spago luncheon in which he discussed his plans to support her campaign if Bill would come aboard Stan Lee Media.
He passed when he said he discussed it with her at the Streisand brunch on Aug. 12, 2000, the day after the Hollywood Gala. He passed when he said that he discussed it with Bill at length at the Gala.
Okay, Hillary, it is your turn. Take a polygraph from the same man. Peter has told the truth all along. Your sworn declaration to the court was false.
Let's get ready to roll. Hillary Clinton has been lying all along. She has done it under oath. She participated in destroying Stan Lee Media and directed the greatest campaign finance fraud in history. We have her on tape in the solicitation and coordination of an illegal $1.6 million hard money, in-kind donation. With your help and the help of the armada of bloggers, the Truth Boating Hillary is going into high gear.
Hillary, dear, they finally got Al Capone on tax evasion. Your time is almost up.
We have had some amazing times together here, haven’t we?
Speaking of Dixie Chicks, you might enjoy this. Big mouth Natalie had said that she was a FReepers’ wet dream. Well, this one’s for you, Natalie - http://youtube.com/watch?v=82OjbOykTwY
Edwards is a harmless joke and Obama is Hillery's hand-picked opponent. Which one do you think will use it?
LOLOL!
Chunk butt! ;o)
That was GREAT!
BTW, for ALL who are reading, the DCs are not the reason I chose my screen name.
I’ve been bashed recently because of it...(check the “to” field)
BTTT
Well, it seems that Michelle Obama has bigger huevos than her husband. Perhaps she will use it. Actually, the same goes for the Breck Girl. He hides behind his wife’s skirt.
Polygraph tests are only as good as the Polygraph Examiner.
As in all tests it is imperative to have a second opinion when it comes to Polygraph examinations.
No that is not true. I spent twenty years administering polygraph tests and also teaching polygraph. They are a very useful tool in a criminal investigation.
They may be a useful tool, but not for determining if someone is telling the truth.
Ping.
Hillary is not even willing to be asked about these incidents by the press, much less submit to a polygraph.
Yet she wants the USA to submit to her anti-freedom, socialist wealth-redistribution and health care schemes. Waterboarding works for me.
The civil suit is about the destruction of Stan Lee Media, a business fraud. Peter spent over $1.6 mil on Hillary’s campaign because of Bill’s promise to work for SLM for one year as a rainmaker. When she lies in a sworn declaration to the court, yes, that is a crime.
About “bad news” or “illegal activities” associated with either of the Clintons?
Shirley you jest. The MSM is covering Thompson’s shoes and Mitt’s evolution of his stance on abortion. And his religion. And the Mormon Church.
Do you think this will help Hillary get swift boated?
Keep going, Doug. We’re behind you here at FR.
Thanks for the ping!
I’m still having difficulty seeing what this has to do with anything. As we often point out in similar situations, what’s the underlying crime, if any?
This should help - http://youtube.com/watch?v=qcbg72tK_ks
With her agent Kelly Craighead, a White House employee, she directly solicited a $1.6 mil hard money, in-kind donation. That was only $1,598,000 above the legal limit. She had her spokesman lie about Paul’s donation to all of the voters. Her campaign finance chairman caused false reporting. Her treasurer hid the money. She has had filed on her behalf four false FEC reports. An assistant US ATTY withheld video information while official investigations were ongoing, and the FEC said she had nothing to do with it. Even for Washington, this is a coverup as never before seen.
If it lasts longer than four hours, see your Doctor
The advise in the ads is to seek "medical attention." And I know a nurse who gets off work at 11:00.
Great news, Doug! Thanks for keeping us posted. We’re one step closer to nailing the lid on her coffin.........or his. LOL Hopefully, it will be her and not Paul. If he can just stay alive until they go to trial. Maybe she will be convicted. Even if she doesn’t go to prison, THAT would be the end of her presidential run! :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.