“Congrats to all of the conservatives here that are falling for the bait that the liberal media is putting out there for you.”
Yes the liberal media makes pitbulls attack.
No, the liberal media does not make the dog attack, but it certainly does hype the few attacks that do occur.
Remember that the same media that has misled you into thinking that the pitbull is the most dangerous creature alive also is telling you that:
Iraq is a lost cause,
America is the cause of the world’s ills,
white folk are guilty of everything,
and it’s all men’s fault.
Try using some logic. This breed has been around for several hundred years, and was a North American favourite for a pet for the majority of that time.
Any human aggression was WHOLLY unacceptable in fighting dogs when dogfights were acceptable, because the handlers would have to go into the ring and separate the dogs. If ANY dog couldn’t control itself when a human hand was involved, it was immediately removed from the gene pool.
The problem today seems to stem more from idiots owning these dogs, AND their lack of association with small children.
>Yes the liberal media makes pitbulls attack.<
Is it possible, that by sensationalizing pit bull attacks, the media is at least somewhat responsible in attracting the type of person who actually wants a “mean” dog, that will attack people, and that can kill other dogs?
If you go into certain parts of the country, you see many, many individuals with pit bulls. In other parts, the predominant dog breed is the Golden Retriever.
Every time the media sensationalizes a pit bull attack, they play to the mindset of those who want and encourage anti-social dog behavior.