[Califreak]

“Please provide some citations to peer reviewed medical/scientific articles. Thanks.”

http://www.nofluoride.com/

Many links in here. This should get you started.

[mnehring]

That site is pretty sad. If they don’t even know the difference between sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride, it shouldn’t be given any credence.

[CMAC51]

Sorry, but this is mostly anecdotal crap. There are no citations of new studies. Discounts the results previous studies without any detailed basis. It refers to lack of control of contaminates and levels of desired additaves, which is bogus because water systems by law are thouroughly tested for content and reports filed with the federal government.

This web site uses all of the standard mis-direction and inflammatory quotes that typically mask the total lack of supporting scientific evidence for an argument. Better known as “Boob bait for the Bubbas”.

[aruanan]

“Please provide some citations to peer reviewed medical/scientific articles. Thanks.”

Note that they requested peer-reviewed medical/scientific studies, not polemics. You can start with www.quackwatch.com. There's a lot that could help many people on this and similar threads.

http://www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/facts/index.asp

REVIEW OF FLUORIDE: BENEFITS AND RISKS