To: CheyennePress; elizabetty; redgirlinabluestate
No, dinkus. That's why I said it was time to let go of your ancient poll. Date of Rasmussen poll I quoted and linked to: Wednesday, August 22, 2007
The Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 44% of Likely Voters would definitely vote against Romney if hes on the ballot in 2008. Thats a point higher than the 43% who would definitely vote against Clinton. Only one other possible candidate surpassed Clinton in this category all year (former House Speaker Newt Gingrich who is not considered a candidate at this time).
Elizabetty: "Are you really incapable of reading the poll results?"
Considering you posted on the thread that I sourced..... wow. You really have comprehension problems.
16% say they would definitely vote FOR Romney
44% say they would definitely vote AGAINST Romney
That is absolutely pathetic. Yes, that includes Republicans, Democrats, and Independents -- nice to see Mitt has already alienated the swing voters who don't want some phony finger-in-the-wind BS artist.
26 posted on
08/22/2007 8:47:46 AM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
To: JohnnyZ
Screaming does not make your argument or that poll any more realistic. I’m sorry, squirrelboy.
To: JohnnyZ
The people polled in the other poll INCLUDES DEMOCRATS!
It does not matter how many democrats will not vote for Romney in the Republican primaries.
By the way
What's with the really BIG WORDS in your posts, overcompensating for some shortcoming?
29 posted on
08/22/2007 9:00:29 AM PDT by
elizabetty
(The funding dried up and I can no longer afford Tagline Messages.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson